I refuse to accept that the world is so poor, when just one week of global spending on armies is enough to bring all of our children into classrooms.
Kailash SatyarthiRead
If not now, then when? If not you, then who? If we are able to answer these fundamental questions, then perhaps we can wipe away the blot of human slavery.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the urgency of taking action against injustice and the importance of individual responsibility.
Kailash Satyarthi's quote challenges individuals to reflect on their own role in combating issues like slavery and injustice. It poses two fundamental questions that highlight the necessity of timely action and personal accountability, suggesting that if we are aware of a problem and capable of making a change, we should not hesitate to do so. This call to action aims to inspire collective responsibility and mobilization in the fight against human rights abuses.
In practice
Use this quote during a speech at a human rights conference to inspire action.
I refuse to accept that the world is so poor, when just one week of global spending on armies is enough to bring all of our children into classrooms.
We adults, our policies, our ways of governance, are responsible for poverty, not the children.
Child labor perpetuates poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, population growth and other social problems.
The single aim of my life is that every child is:_x000D_ free to be a child,_x000D_ free to grow and develop,_x000D_ free to eat, sleep, see daylight,_x000D_ free to laugh and cry,_x000D_ free to play,_x000D_ free to learn, free to go to school, and above all, free to dream.
I dream for a world which is free of child labour, a world in which every child goes to school. A world in which every child gets his rights.
World's children cannot wait any longer. While international community debates and issues recommendations, statements and fine speeches, world's children - marginalised, socially excluded, poor and vulnerable - continue to suffer.
My study of Gandhi convinced me that true pacifism is not nonresistance to evil, but nonviolent resistance to evil. Between the two positions, there is a world of difference. Gandhi resisted evil with as much vigor and power as the violent resister, but True pacifism is not unrealistic submission to evil power. It is rather a courageous confrontation of evil by the power of love. . . .
After so much suffering, after enduring so much sacrifice, sanctioned and embraced by our people, what is it that the people of East Timor expect as a result of independence?
I approve of anyone wearing what the establishment says you must not wear.
He is courageous who endures and fears the right thing, for the right motive, in the right way and at the right times.
There's a difference between bravery and rash stupidity.
The American Dream has been defended, in every generation, by the brave men and women willing to fight and die for America. They are our greatest national treasure. They deserve a serious Commander-in-Chief.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.