The age of Chivalry is gone. An age of Humanity has come.
Charles SumnerRead
Can there be in our age any peace that is not honorable, any war that is not dishonorable?
Interpretation
The quote questions the morality of peace and war in contemporary society.
Charles Sumner's quote reflects on the ethical implications of both peace and war in modern times. He suggests that true peace must be honorable, devoid of dishonor or corruption, while also indicating that any war fought for unjust reasons is inherently disgraceful. The quote challenges individuals to evaluate the morality behind political actions and conflicts, urging a deep reflection on the values that define our age.
In practice
In a speech about political ethics, one might say, 'As Charles Sumner once asked, can there be peace without honor?'
The age of Chivalry is gone. An age of Humanity has come.
The true greatness of nations is in those qualities which constitute the greatness of the individual.
War is a positive, precise and specific evil, of gigantic proportions ...making within the sphere of its influence all true grandeur impossible.
The true grandeur of humanity is in moral elevation, sustained, enlightened and decorated by the intellect of man
No true and permanent fame can be founded, except in labors which promote the happiness of mankind.
Give me the money that has been spent in war and I will clothe every man, woman, and child in an attire of which kings and queens will be proud. I will build a schoolhouse in every valley over the whole earth. I will crown every hillside with a place of worship consecrated to peace.
I think that cosmetic enhancements in my profession are just an occupational hazard. But I think, more culturally, I'm interested in starting the conversation about aging gracefully and how, instead of making it a cultural problem, we make it individuals' problems.
No man is rich enough to buy back his past.
There must be some kind of way out of here,' said the joker to the thief.
Your work is your own private megaphone to tell the world what you believe.
The individual is defined only by his relationship to the world and to other individuals; he exists only by transcending himself, and his freedom can be achieved only through the freedom of others. He justifies his existence by a movement which, like freedom, springs from his heart but which leads outside of himself.
I feel, am mad as any writer must in one way be; why not make it real? I am too close to the bourgeois society of suburbia: too close to people I know I must sever my self from them, or be a part of their world: this half and half compromise is intolerable.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.