Almost everywhere, climate change denial now looks as stupid and as unacceptable as Holocaust denial.
Interpretation
The quote compares climate change denial to Holocaust denial, emphasizing the irrationality and unacceptability of denying well-established truths.
George Monbiot's quote highlights the absurdity of denying climate change by equating it with the denial of the Holocaust, an atrocity that is universally recognized as a horrific fact of history. This parallel serves to criticize those who refuse to accept the scientific consensus on climate change, suggesting that such denial is not only misguided but morally reprehensible, thereby calling for a greater awareness and action regarding environmental issues.
In practice
In a debate about environmental policy, one could use this quote to emphasize the importance of acknowledging climate change.
The notions that nature exists to serve us; that its value consists of the instrumental benefits we can extract; that this value can be measured in cash terms; and that what can't be measured does not matter, have proved lethal to the rest of life on Earth.
I believe that anyone who wants to stand in a national election should receive a course of psychotherapy. Completing the course should be a qualification for office. This wouldn't change the behaviour of psychopaths, but it might prevent some people who exercise power from imposing their own deep wounds on others.
I became an environmentalist because I love the living world, but I spend much of my life thinking about electricity, industrial processes and civil engineering.
Places that have become agricultural deserts, trashed by giant corporations, could be reforested, drawing carbon dioxide from the air on a vast scale. The ecosystems of land and sea could recover, not just in pockets but across great tracts of the planet.
Never underestimate the power of intrinsic values. They inspire every struggle for a better world.
Why is it so easy to save the banks - but so hard to save the biosphere?
Science affects the average man and woman in two ways already. He or she benefits by its application driving a motor-car or omnibus instead of a horse-drawn vehicle, being treated for disease by a doctor or surgeon rather than a witch, and being killed with an automatic pistol or shell in place of a dagger or a battle-axe.
Nuclear accidents anywhere can affect people everywhere.
It's very important for us to see that science is done by people, not just brains but whole human beings, and sometimes at great cost.
As our own species is in the process of proving, one cannot have superior science and inferior morals. The combination is unstable and self-destroying.
The laws of Congress and the laws of physics have grown increasingly divergent, and the laws of physics are not likely to yield.
What really matters for me is ... the more active role of the observer in quantum physics ... According to quantum physics the observer has indeed a new relation to the physical events around him in comparison with the classical observer, who is merely a spectator.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.