You don't have to love animals to recognize that it is immoral and unjust to exploit them. But if you do love animals, but you continue to participate in their exploitation, you need to rethink your idea of what love means.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the moral obligation to treat animals ethically, regardless of personal feelings about them.
Gary L. Francione's quote highlights the ethical responsibility in our interactions with animals. He asserts that even if one does not have a fondness for animals, the exploitation of them is inherently wrong. Moreover, he challenges those who claim to love animals yet still partake in practices that harm them, suggesting a reevaluation of their understanding of love. The essence of the quote stresses the importance of aligning our actions with ethical beliefs and emotions.
In practice
During a speech at an animal rights event, one might use this quote to provoke thought about ethical treatment.
The idea that we have the right to inflict suffering and death on other sentient beings for the trivial reasons of palate pleasure and fashion is, without doubt, one of the most arrogant and morally repugnant notions in the history of human thought.
Humans treat animals as things that exist as means to human ends. That's morally wrong. Sexism promotes the idea that women are things that exist as means to the ends of men. That's morally wrong. We need to stop treating all persons - whether human or nonhuman - as things.
They are nonhuman persons. They are not food. If animals matter morally at all, there is one and only one rational response: go vegan. Everything else is just participation in animal exploitation.
We cannot talk simultaneously about animal rights and the 'humane' slaughter of animals.
We are vegans not simply because being vegan will reduce suffering. We are vegan because every sentient being values her or his life even if no one else does. We are vegan because justice minimally requires that we not take life for trivial purposes.
We can no more justify using nonhumans as human resources than we can justify human slavery. Animal use and slavery have at least one important point in common: both institutions treat sentient beings exclusively as resources of others. That cannot be justified with respect to humans; it cannot be justified with respect to nonhumans—however “humanely” we treat them.
The beauty of our system is that it isolates everybody. Each person is sitting alone in front of the tube, you know. It's very hard to have ideas or thoughts under those circumstances. You can't fight the world alone.
Yet food is something that is taken for granted by most world leaders despite the fact that more than half of the population of the world is hungry.
Because every portion of the body, mind, and spirit yearns for the integration of yin and yang, angelic intercourse is led by the spirit rather than the sexual organs. . . . Where ordinary intercourse unites sex organs with sex organs, angelic cultivation unites spirit with spirit, mind with mind, and every cell of one body with every cell of the other body.
Every period ruled by mystics was an era of stagnation and want, when most men were on strike against existence.
The Church does not dispense the sacrament of baptism in order to acquire for herself an increase in membership but in order to consecrate a human being to God and to communicate to that person the divine gift of birth from God.
After faith comes repentance, or, rather, repentance is faith's twin brother and is born at the same time.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.