We learn to be racist, therefore we can learn not to be racist. Racism is not genetical. It has everything to do with power.
Jane ElliottRead
We dont know anything about racism. Weve never experienced it. If words can make a difference in your life for seven minutes, how would it affect you if you heard this every day of your life?
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the profound impact of words and experience, particularly regarding racism and its daily effects on individuals.
Jane Elliott's quote reflects on the pervasive nature of racism and how the lack of understanding stems from not experiencing it personally. She underscores the significant influence that words can have on a person's life, suggesting that those who are privileged enough not to encounter racism daily may not grasp its true weight. By posing a hypothetical scenario of hearing a negative message daily, she invites reflection on the psychological toll of constant exposure to prejudice.
Themes
RacismWordsExperienceImpactPrejudice
In practice
Example use cases
Using this quote in a presentation on social justice to highlight the effects of systemic racism.
More from Jane Elliott
All quotes →White people’s number one freedom, in the United States of America, is the freedom to be totally ignorant of those who are other than white. We don’t have to learn about those who are other than white. And our number two freedom is the freedom to deny that we’re ignorant.
Jane ElliottRead
We are still conditioning people in this country and, indeed, all over the globe to the myth of white superiority. We are constantly being told that we don't have racism in this country anymore, but most of the people who are saying that are white. White people think it isn't happening because it isn't happening to them.
Jane ElliottRead
This country isn't a melting pot. Think of this country as a stir fry. That's what this country should be. A place where people are appreciated for who they are.
Jane ElliottRead
Similar quotes
In any institution-factory, university, health center, or whatever-there are a variety of interests that ought to be represented in decision-making: the work force itself, the community in which it is located, users of its products or services, institutions that compete for the same resources. These interests should be directly represented in democratic structures that displace and eliminate private ownership of the means of production or resources, an anachronism with no legitimacy.
Noam ChomskyRead
Capitalism’s grow-or-die imperative stands radically at odds with ecology’s imperative of interdependence and limit. The two imperatives can no longer coexist with each other; nor can any society founded on the myth that they can be reconciled hope to survive. Either we will establish an ecological society or society will go under for everyone, irrespective of his or her status.
Ursula K. Le GuinRead
The improvement of life was only accomplished to the extent to which it was based on a change of consciousness, that is, to the extent to which the law of violence was replaced in men's consciousness by the law of love.
Leo TolstoyRead
Infuriatingly stupid analysts - especially people who called themselves Arabists, yet who seemed to know next to nothing about the reality of the Islamic world - wrote reams of commentary [after 9/11]. Their articles were all about Islam saving Aristotle and the zero, which medieval Muslim scholars had done more than eight hundred years ago; about Islam being a religion of peace and tolerance, not the slightest bit violent. These were fairy tales, nothing to do with the real world I knew.
Ayaan Hirsi AliRead
Gentle Jesus, meek and mild' is a snivelling modern invention, with no warrant in the gospels.
George Bernard ShawRead
In the United States, doing good has come to be, like patriotism, a favorite device of persons with something to sell.
H. L. MenckenRead