People are reasonably good at estimating how things add up, but for compounding, which involved repeated multiplication, we fail to appreciate how quickly things grow.
If you go back to the really long-run questions that interested me, the big question was why, over the centuries, the millennia, has growth been speeding up?
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote reflects on the historical acceleration of economic growth and the underlying reasons behind this trend.
In this quote, Paul Romer expresses a deep curiosity about the factors driving sustained economic growth throughout history. He highlights the significance of understanding why growth has not only been a persistent phenomenon over centuries but has also been accelerating, suggesting that underlying societal, technological, and economic frameworks have evolved in ways that foster this upward trend.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a conference on economic policies, one might say, 'As Paul Romer pointed out, we must ask ourselves why growth has been speeding up over the centuries.'
More from Paul Romer
All quotes βWhen somebody discovers something like the quadratic formula or the Pythagorean theorem, the convention in science is that he can't control that idea. He has to give it away. He publishes it. What's rewarded in science is dissemination of ideas.
An economy can survive with 10% of the population insolation. It can't survive when 50% of the population is in isolation.
One of the most powerful insights in economics is this idea of a division of labor. You do the thing you're good at. Other people do something else that they're good at. The net effect is better for everybody.
Human material existence is limited by ideas, not stuff, people don't need copper wires they need ways to communicate, oil was a contaminant, then it became a fuel
It is the job of government to prevent a tragedy of the commons. That includes the commons of shared values and norms on which democracy depends.
Similar quotes
There is no western, capitalistic country in which the conditions of the masses have not improved in an unprecedented way.
Constructive trade, the two-way exchange of goods and services, is the most efficient and logical way for each nation . . . to build a stable prosperity, a prosperity based not on aid, but on mutually beneficial economic contacts.
Income inequality is troubling because, among other things, it means that many people in our society don't have the opportunities to advance themselves.
There is no doubt that as an economy grows in a great way like India has, that you have to step back and change your tax systems, because you start to get more disparities of wealth.
I am in favor of high wages and agree that the higher the wages, the stronger the evidence of prosperity, provided (and that is the important point) they are so naturally, by the effectiveness of industry, and not in consequence of an inflated currency or any artificial regulation.
The unions might be good for the people who are in the unions but it doesn't do a thing for the people who are unemployed. Because the union keeps down the number of jobs, it doesn't do a thing for them.