For the better part of two centuries, outsiders have been offering explanations that range from racist to learned-sounding - the supposed inferiority of blacks, the heritage of slavery, overpopulation - for why Haiti remains the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.
Interpretation
The quote critiques the simplistic and often prejudiced views on Haiti's poverty.
Adam Hochschild's quote reflects on the long-standing external perceptions regarding Haiti's socioeconomic struggles. He indicates that these views, ranging from racist to ostensibly educated, fail to capture the complex historical and systemic factors that contribute to the nation's poverty, including the legacy of slavery and colonialism. The quote challenges the reader to look beyond superficial explanations and consider the deeper sociopolitical realities that shape Haiti's current conditions.
In practice
During a social justice seminar discussing global poverty, this quote can serve to highlight the need for nuanced understanding.
Someday, I have no doubt, the dead from today's wars will be seen with a similar sense of sorrow at needless loss and folly as those millions of men who lie in the cemeteries of France and Belgium - and tens of millions of Americans will feel a similar revulsion for the politicians and generals who were so spendthrift with others' lives.
Fortunately analysis is not the only way to resolve inner conflicts. Life itself still remains a very effective therapist.
Everyone knows that when you look at a television ad, you do not expect to get information. You expect to see delusion and imagery.
When you believe you have a future, you think in terms of generations and years. When you do not, you live not just by the day — but by the minute.
Independence-is loyalty to one's best self and principles, and this is often disloyalty to the general idols and fetishes.
I realize that many elements of the Buddhist teaching can be found in Christianity, Judaism, Islam. I think if Buddhism can help, it is the concrete methods of practice.
But you answer, that the Constitution recognizes property in slaves. It would be sufficient, then, to reply, that this constitutional recognition must be void, because it is repugnant to the law of nature and of nations.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.