Religion has very little to do with the number of babies per woman. All the religions in the world are fully [able] to maintain their values and adapt to this new world.
Hans RoslingRead
Beyond 2050 the world population may start to decrease if women across the world will have, on average, less than 2 children. But that decrease will be slow.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that global population growth will slow down and potentially reverse if women's average childbirth rates fall below a certain threshold.
Hans Rosling highlights the demographic implications of declining birth rates among women worldwide. The statement implies that if women have fewer than two children on average, the global population may eventually decrease. However, he also points out that such a decline would be gradual, emphasizing the need to consider the long-term impacts of reproductive choices on global demographics.
In practice
During a seminar on sustainable development, one might reference this quote to discuss the future of global resources.
Religion has very little to do with the number of babies per woman. All the religions in the world are fully [able] to maintain their values and adapt to this new world.
Health cannot be bought at the supermarket. You have to invest in health. You have to get kids into schooling. You have to train health staff. You have to educate the population.
When I have an argument with someone, even with someone I am not very close with, I can't sleep at night thinking about it. It's terrible. But I still manage speak out frankly because I have also been gifted with the ability to read people. I can sense when they start to get irritated with me, and then, I shift.
You don't have to get rich to have [fewer] children. It has happened across the world.
I have a suggestion for a new name for the developing world. Let's call it the world.
If your economy grows [by] 4 percent, you ought to reduce child mortality 4 percent.
Any important disease whose causality is murky, and for which treatment is ineffectual, tends to be awash in significance.
When a physician is called to a patient, he should decide on the diagnosis, then the prognosis, and then the treatment. ... Physicians must know the evolution of the disease, its duration and gravity in order to predict its course and outcome. Here statistics intervene to guide physicians, by teaching them the proportion of mortal cases, and if observation has also shown that the successful and unsuccessful cases can be recognized by certain signs, then the prognosis is more certain.
Evolution is a fact. It is the best explanation of what is known from observations. It's a theory as powerful as the theory of gravity.
Perhaps most ridiculous of all is the suggestion that we 'keep' our radioactive garbage for the use of our descendants. This 'solution', I think, requires an immediate poll of the next 20,000 generations.
Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio.
To those who ask what the infinitely small quantity in mathematics is, we answer that it is actually zero. Hence there are not so many mysteries hidden in this concept as they are usually believed to be.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.