Religion has very little to do with the number of babies per woman. All the religions in the world are fully [able] to maintain their values and adapt to this new world.
Hans RoslingRead
Beyond 2050 the world population may start to decrease if women across the world will have, on average, less than 2 children. But that decrease will be slow.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that global population growth will slow down and potentially reverse if women's average childbirth rates fall below a certain threshold.
Hans Rosling highlights the demographic implications of declining birth rates among women worldwide. The statement implies that if women have fewer than two children on average, the global population may eventually decrease. However, he also points out that such a decline would be gradual, emphasizing the need to consider the long-term impacts of reproductive choices on global demographics.
In practice
During a seminar on sustainable development, one might reference this quote to discuss the future of global resources.
Religion has very little to do with the number of babies per woman. All the religions in the world are fully [able] to maintain their values and adapt to this new world.
Health cannot be bought at the supermarket. You have to invest in health. You have to get kids into schooling. You have to train health staff. You have to educate the population.
When I have an argument with someone, even with someone I am not very close with, I can't sleep at night thinking about it. It's terrible. But I still manage speak out frankly because I have also been gifted with the ability to read people. I can sense when they start to get irritated with me, and then, I shift.
You don't have to get rich to have [fewer] children. It has happened across the world.
I have a suggestion for a new name for the developing world. Let's call it the world.
If your economy grows [by] 4 percent, you ought to reduce child mortality 4 percent.
The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response.
If everything in chemistry is explained in a satisfactory manner without the help of phlogiston, it is by that reason alone infinitely probable that the principle does not exist; that it is a hypothetical body, a gratuitous supposition; indeed, it is in the principles of good logic, not to multiply bodies without necessity.
Scientists are people of very dissimilar temperaments doing different things in very different ways. Among scientists are collectors, classifiers and compulsive tidiers-up; many are detectives by temperament and many are explorers; some are artists and others artisans. There are poet-scientists and philosopher-scientists and even a few mystics.
The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an improved theory, is it then a science or faith?
The moment I saw the model and heard about the complementing base pairs I realized that it was the key to understanding all the problems in biology we had found intractable - it was the birth of molecular biology.
The history is important because science is a discipline deeply immersed in history. In other words, every time you perform an experiment in science or in medicine, what you're actually doing is you're answering someone, answering a question raised by someone in the past.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.