Nothing ever gets settled in this town. a seething debating society in which the debate never stops, in which people never give up, including me. And so that's the atmosphere in which you administer.
If they are too big to fail, make them smaller.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote suggests that entities deemed 'too big to fail' should be reduced in size to prevent future crises.
George P. Shultz's quote addresses the concept of 'too big to fail' institutions, implying that when organizations reach such a size that their failure could lead to significant economic turmoil, it is prudent to take steps to diminish their size and, consequently, their impact on the economy. By advocating for making these entities smaller, the quote highlights the importance of creating a balance that prevents systemic risk, suggesting that size can lead to irresponsibility and fragility.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about financial regulations, one might quote this to emphasize the need for limiting the growth of major institutions.
More from George P. Shultz
All quotes βHe who walks in the middle of the roads gets hit from both sides.
The minute you start talking about what you're going to do if you lose, you have lost.
What we want is scientists who don't become part of the policy discussion: All they do is produce science. If someone becomes an advocate, then I won't pay as much attention to their science.
I want my grandchildren to be proud of me. That's the main thing.
Increasingly, the state system has been eroding. Terrorists have exploited this weakness by burrowing into the state system in order to attack it.
Similar quotes
The Middle East has the highest unemployment percentage of any region in the world we have the largest youth cohort of history coming into the market place that frustration does translate into the political sphere when people are hungry and without jobs.
If strong economic conditions can partially reverse supply-side damage after it has occurred, then policymakers may want to aim at being more accommodative during recoveries than would be called for under the traditional view that supply is largely independent of demand.
The widely accepted assertion that, only if you let markets be will everyone be paid correctly and thus fairly, according to his worth, is a myth. Only when we part with this myth and grasp the political nature of the market and the collective nature of individual productivity will we be able to build a more just society in which historical legacies and collective actions, and not just individual talents and efforts, are properly taken into account in deciding how to reward people.
Developing economies may not have much control over the headwinds that they face today, but that does not mean that they are powerless. Much can be done not just to sustain moderate growth but also to secure a more prosperous and resilient future.
To restore confidence in our markets and our financial institutions so they can fuel continued growth and prosperity, we must address the underlying problem. The federal government must implement a program to remove these illiquid assets that are weighing down our financial institutions and threatening our economy.
Independent economists say immigration reform will grow our economy and shrink our deficits by almost $1 trillion in the next two decades. And for good reason: when people come here to fulfill their dreams - to study, invent, and contribute to our culture - they make our country a more attractive place for businesses to locate and create jobs for everyone. So let's get immigration reform done this year.