We certainly have to have a view about knowledge in order to decide whether some version of foreknowledge is necessary for inquiry or whether some philosopher or other thinks it is. Roughly, the more demanding our conception of knowledge is, the less plausible foreknowledge is; the weaker our conception of knowledge is, the more plausible foreknowledge is.
Even if we don't have any knowledge in this life, we have and tend to rely on relevant true beliefs; and that's sufficient for inquiry. - Gail Fine
Even if we don't have any knowledge in this life, we have and tend to rely on relevant true beliefs; and that's sufficient for inquiry.
- Gail Fine
If historians of philosophy are to be divided into those who focus on discontinuities and those who focus on continuities, I belong in the latter cam… - Gail Fine
If historians of philosophy are to be divided into those who focus on discontinuities and those who focus on continuities, I belong in the latter cam…
So long as knowledge goes beyond mere true belief, foreknowledge is implausible, since having and relying on relevant true beliefs is sufficient for … - Gail Fine
So long as knowledge goes beyond mere true belief, foreknowledge is implausible, since having and relying on relevant true beliefs is sufficient for …
We certainly have to have a view about knowledge in order to decide whether some version of foreknowledge is necessary for inquiry or whether some ph… - Gail Fine
We certainly have to have a view about knowledge in order to decide whether some version of foreknowledge is necessary for inquiry or whether some ph…
The reason we can't attain the highest level of knowledge while incarnate is that we can't then wholly escape the influence of the body (and so of pe… - Gail Fine
The reason we can't attain the highest level of knowledge while incarnate is that we can't then wholly escape the influence of the body (and so of pe…
Login to join the discussion
Login to join the discussion