The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response.
Those who say that climate change doesn't exist are being understood as the flat-earthers that they are, as the people who deny the link between smoking and cancer, as the people who denied the link between HIV and AIDS.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Climate change denial is compared to historical denial of scientific truths.
In this quote, Nicholas Stern highlights the intense disbelief surrounding climate change by comparing its deniers to individuals who historically rejected clear scientific evidence, such as flat-earthers, and those who discounted the connections between smoking and cancer or HIV and AIDS. This analogy emphasizes the irrationality and potential dangers of denying scientifically validated phenomena, showcasing how such denialism can hinder progress and understanding in critical areas affecting humanity.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a political debate about environmental policies, this quote can underline the need for scientific acknowledgment.
More from Nicholas Stern
All quotes →There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now.
The basic scientific conclusions on climate change are very robust and for good reason. The greenhouse effect is simple science: greenhouse gases trap heat, and humans are emitting ever more greenhouse gases.
If you look at all the serious scientists in the world, there is no big disagreement on the basics of this... it would be absolute lunacy to act as if climate change is not occurring.
This [climate change] is potentially so dangerous that we have to act strongly. Do we want to play Russian roulette with two bullets or one?
Do politicians understand just how difficult it could be, just how devastating rises of 4C, 5C or 6C could be? I think, not yet
Similar quotes
One general law, leading to the advancement of all organic beings, namely, multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.
Perhaps one day earthquakes, hurricanes and financial crashes will all be predictable. But we don't have to wait until then for seismology, meteorology and economics to become sciences; they already are.
The present situation in physics is as if we know chess, but we don't know one or two rules.
One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.
It is the first duty of a hypothesis to be intelligible.
Science has to be understood in its broadest sense, as a method for apprehending all observable reality, and not merely as an instrument for acquiring specialized knowledge.