The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response.
Nicholas SternRead
Those who say that climate change doesn't exist are being understood as the flat-earthers that they are, as the people who deny the link between smoking and cancer, as the people who denied the link between HIV and AIDS.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Climate change denial is compared to historical denial of scientific truths.
In this quote, Nicholas Stern highlights the intense disbelief surrounding climate change by comparing its deniers to individuals who historically rejected clear scientific evidence, such as flat-earthers, and those who discounted the connections between smoking and cancer or HIV and AIDS. This analogy emphasizes the irrationality and potential dangers of denying scientifically validated phenomena, showcasing how such denialism can hinder progress and understanding in critical areas affecting humanity.
Themes
Climate ChangeDenialScienceEvidenceTruthSociety
In practice
Example use cases
In a political debate about environmental policies, this quote can underline the need for scientific acknowledgment.
More from Nicholas Stern
All quotes →There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now.
Nicholas SternRead
The basic scientific conclusions on climate change are very robust and for good reason. The greenhouse effect is simple science: greenhouse gases trap heat, and humans are emitting ever more greenhouse gases.
Nicholas SternRead
If you look at all the serious scientists in the world, there is no big disagreement on the basics of this... it would be absolute lunacy to act as if climate change is not occurring.
Nicholas SternRead
This [climate change] is potentially so dangerous that we have to act strongly. Do we want to play Russian roulette with two bullets or one?
Nicholas SternRead
Do politicians understand just how difficult it could be, just how devastating rises of 4C, 5C or 6C could be? I think, not yet
Nicholas SternRead
Similar quotes
If two scientists are giving their papers at a symposium, and one of them is just naturally better at talking to the public or talking to a group of people, that scientist is liable to get more attention - in fact, I'm told that they do get more attention - than the one who's a little more stiff about it. Well, that's not good for science.
Alan AldaRead
Evolution has encountered no intellectual trouble; no new arguments have been offered. Creationism is a home-grown phenomenon of American sociocultural history-a splinter movement ... who believe that every word in the Bible must be literally true, whatever such a claim might mean.
Stephen Jay GouldRead
It is generally believed that our science is empirical and that we draw our concepts and our mathematical constructs from the empirical data. If this were the whole truth, we should, when entering into a new field, introduce only such quantities as can directly be observed, and formulate natural laws only by means of these quantities.
Werner HeisenbergRead
My dear Kepler, what would you say of the learned here, who, replete with the pertinacity of the asp, have steadfastly refused to cast a glance through the telescope? What shall we make of this? Shall we laugh, or shall we cry?
Galileo GalileiRead
I remember it was hard to believe that I was taking a step onto the lunar surface.
Buzz AldrinRead
The present situation in physics is as if we know chess, but we don't know one or two rules.
Richard P. FeynmanRead