Anarchists know that a long period of education must precede any great fundamental change in society, hence they do not believe in vote begging, nor political campaigns, but rather in the development of self-thinking individuals.
Concentrated power can be always wielded in the interest of the few and at the expense of the many. Government in its last analysis is this power reduced to a science. Governments never lead; they follow progress. When the prison, stake or scaffold can no longer silence the voice of the protesting minority, progress moves on a step, but not until then.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Concentrated power can be abused, often benefiting a small group while oppressing the majority, and true progress occurs only when the voices of dissent are acknowledged.
This quote by Lucy Parsons highlights the dangers of concentrated power within governments, suggesting that such power tends to serve the interests of a privileged few rather than the many. Parsons argues that while governments may appear to lead societal progress, they are more often reactive to the demands and struggles of the people, particularly when facing resistance from marginalized voices. Only when these voices are no longer silenced can genuine progress be achieved, indicating the necessity of recognizing and valuing dissent in democratic societies.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a political speech to highlight the need for accountability in government.
More from Lucy Parsons
All quotes →Similar quotes
However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
The over-representation of Wall Street banks in senior government positions sends a bad message. It tells people that one - and only one - point of view will dominate economic policymaking.
There's really no point to voting. If it made any difference, it would probably be illegal.
Since taking office, I've made it clear that the United States was prepared to begin a new chapter of engagement with the Islamic Republic of Iran. We offered the Iranian government a clear choice. It could fulfill its international obligations and realize greater security, deeper economic and political integration with the world, and a better future for all Iranians. Or it could continue to flout its responsibilities and face even more pressure and isolation.
Governments can err, Presidents do make mistakes, but the immortal Dante tells us that divine justice weighs the sins of the cold-blooded and the sins of the warm-hearted in different scales. Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the constant omission of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference.
If we want people to vote, we need to make it a larger part of their self-image.