For those whose exclusive norm of constitutional judging is merely fair reading of language applied to facts objectively viewed, 'Brown' must either be flat-out wrong or a very mystifying decision.
David SouterRead
The Constitution is a pantheon of values, and a lot of hard cases are hard because the Constitution gives no simple rule of decision for the cases in which one of the values is truly at odds with another.
Interpretation
The Constitution embodies complex values that can conflict, making legal decisions challenging.
David Souter’s quote reflects the intricate nature of the Constitution as a framework of values rather than a set of simplistic rules. It emphasizes that when values specified in the Constitution clash, there is often no straightforward solution, highlighting the difficulty faced by judges and lawmakers in interpreting and applying these values in real-world situations.
In practice
In a law class discussing the complexities of legal interpretation, this quote can illustrate the challenges judges face.
For those whose exclusive norm of constitutional judging is merely fair reading of language applied to facts objectively viewed, 'Brown' must either be flat-out wrong or a very mystifying decision.
The language of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection of the laws did not change between 1896 and 1954, and it would be very hard to say that the obvious facts on which 'Plessy' was based had changed.
There is a danger to judicial independence when people have no understanding of how the judiciary fits into the constitutional scheme.
The Constitution is no simple contract, not because it uses a certain amount of open-ended language, but because its language grants and guarantees many good things, and good things that compete with each other and can never all be realized, altogether, all at once.
Some recent philosophers seem to have given their moral approval to these deplorable verdicts that affirm that the intelligence of an individual is a fixed quantity, a quantity that cannot be augmented. We must protest and react against this brutal pessimism; we will try to demonstrate that it is founded on nothing.
It seemed to her such nonsense-inventing differences, when people, heaven knows, were different enough without that.
Viper will eat viper, and it would serve them both right!
Survival, in the cool economics of biology, means simply the persistence of one's own genes in the generations to follow.
I did used to have nightmares about the idea that when I die, there is a spark of consciousness which basically creates the world. 'Is the world going to disappear if this spark of consciousness disappears? And how do I know it won't? How do I know there's anything there except what I'm conscious of?'
And death shall have no dominion. Under the windings of the sea They lying long shall not die windily; Twisting on racks when sinews give way, Strapped to a wheel, yet they shall not break; Faith in their hands shall snap in two, And the unicorn evils run them through; Split all ends up they shan't crack; And death shall have no dominion.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.