Cooking is just a vehicle to express yourself, like painting and acting... The reason why we're cooking is not because we want to put something on the plate. It's so much more complex than that.
Dominique CrennRead
I think cooks that are just interested in molecular gastronomy are cooks that will never be chefs.
Interpretation
True artistry in cooking extends beyond techniques; it requires a deeper passion and connection.
Dominique Crenn's quote emphasizes that while molecular gastronomy, a scientific approach to cooking, can be fascinating, it lacks the essential qualities that define a true chef. She implies that a great cook must have a profound understanding, creativity, and emotional investment in their craft rather than being solely focused on innovative techniques or technology.
In practice
This quote could inspire culinary students to approach their studies with passion, not just technical skill.
Cooking is just a vehicle to express yourself, like painting and acting... The reason why we're cooking is not because we want to put something on the plate. It's so much more complex than that.
Eating is an act of activism for me; it's politics.
My restaurant is an expression of myself - my fantasies. Where I've been, and where I want to be. I think of my cooking as very emotional.
I don't want people to look at my menu and see just the ingredients. I want to take them on a journey.
When I interview people that want to work with us, I often disregard their resume, because a piece of paper, it doesn't tell me really who they are. I'm looking for honesty, vulnerability. I'm looking for strength, I'm looking for weakness. I'm looking also for someone that wants to learn and is excited about learning.
My grandmother was kind, but she knew what she wanted and she wasn't afraid to give a command. When, eventually, I ran my own kitchen, I realized I had a leadership model reaching back into my earliest memories.
Rent is about a community celebrating life, in the face of death and AIDS, at the turn of the century.
All they want to do is tie the poem to a chair with a rope and torture a confession out of it. They begin beating it with a hose to find out what it really means.
My feeling is that poetry is also a healing process, and then when a person tries to write poetry with depth or beauty, he will find himself guided along paths which will heal him, and this is more important, actually, than any of the poetry he writes.
Because the writer must be a participant in the scene, while he's writing it β or at least taping it, or even sketching it. Or all three. Probably the closest analogy to the ideal would be a film director/producer who writes his own scripts, does his own camera work and somehow manages to film himself in action, as the protagonist or at least a main character.
Beauty is perfect in its imperfections, so you just have to go with the imperfections.
For the creation of a masterwork of literature two powers must concur, the power of the man and the power of the moment, and the man is not enough without the moment.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.