It is almost always the case that when someone self-radicalizes, someone close to them sees the sign, which is why we continue to encourage public awareness, public vigilance.
How could somebody be comfortable with authorizing legally the use of lethal force? My view is if you become comfortable with it, then you should get out of the job.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote raises ethical questions about the use of lethal force by authorities, suggesting that comfort with such power is worrisome.
Jeh Johnson's quote reflects a deep concern about the implications of authorizing lethal force in law enforcement or military contexts. It suggests that anyone who becomes at ease with the power to take life should reconsider their position, highlighting the moral weight and responsibility that comes with such authority. This perspective invites a critical examination of how we train individuals in positions of power and the psychological impact of making decisions about life and death.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate about police reform, this quote can highlight the need for ethical considerations in law enforcement.
More from Jeh Johnson
All quotes βOverly simplistic suggestions that we ban people from entering this country, based on religion, or ban people from an entire region of the world is counterproductive. It will not work. We need to build bridges to communities, to American-Muslim communities right now, to encourage them to help us in our homeland security efforts.
Similar quotes
Prana is implicate to matter but explicate to mind; mind is implicate to prana but explicate to soul; soul is implicate to mind but explicate to spirit; and the spirit is the source and suchness of the entire sequence.
I don't know what it is about death that makes it so hard. I suppose it's the one-sided communication; the fact that we never get to ask our loved one if she suffered, if she is happy wherever she is now...if she is somewhere. It's the question mark that comes with death that we can't face, not the period.
I know how easy it is for one to stay well within moral, ethical, and legal bounds through the skillful use of words - and to thereby spin, sidestep, circumvent, or bend a truth completely out of shape. To that extent, we are all liars on numerous occasions.
For this equilibrium now in sight, let us trust that mankind, as it has occurred in the greatest periods of its past, will find for itself a new code of ethics, common to all, made of tolerance, of courage, and of faith in the Spirit of men.
The consciousness of self is the greatest hindrance to the proper execution of all physical action.
I am a book I neither wrote nor read.