could-two-teams-scientists-obviously-contradictory-conclusions-seemingly-every

How could two teams of scientists come to such obviously contradictory conclusions on seemingly every point that matters in the debate over global warming? There are many reasons why scientists disagree, the subject, by the way, of an excellent book a couple years ago titled Wrong by David H. Freedman. A big reason is IPCC is producing what academics call "post-normal science" while NIPCC is producing old-fashioned "real science.

0/5 (0)

Joseph L. Bast's Popular Quotes

0 Comments

Login to join the discussion