There can sometimes be this fear among laypeople: 'I don't understand everything in science perfectly, so I just can't say anything about it.' I think it's good to know that we scientists are also confused some of the time.
Creativity is essential to particle physics, cosmology, and to mathematics, and to other fields of science, just as it is to its more widely acknowledged beneficiaries - the arts and humanities.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Creativity plays a vital role in both scientific fields and the arts, driving innovation and understanding.
In this quote, Lisa Randall emphasizes the importance of creativity not just in the arts and humanities, but also in the scientific domains such as particle physics, cosmology, and mathematics. She suggests that innovation and breakthroughs in science are fueled by creative thinking, highlighting that creativity should be valued across all fields of study, as it is fundamental to advancing knowledge and understanding the universe.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a seminar on interdisciplinary studies, one could use this quote to highlight the intersection of creativity with scientific inquiry.
More from Lisa Randall
All quotes βThere could be more to the universe than the three dimensions we are familiar with. They are hidden from us in some way, perhaps because they're tiny or warped. But even if they're invisible, they could affect what we actually observe in the universe.
We have this very clean picture of science, you know, these well-established rules with which we make predictions. But when you're really doing science, when you're doing research, you're at the edge of what we know.
People who dismiss science in favor of religion sometimes confuse the challenge of rigorously understanding the world with a deliberate intellectual exclusion that leads them to mistrust scientists and, to their detriment, what they discover.
It's hubris to think that the way we see things is everything there is.
Similar quotes
It is mistaken to claim that global problems will be solved more quickly if only researchers would abandon their quest to understand the universe and knuckle down to work on an agenda of public or political concerns. These are not 'either/or' options - indeed, there is a positive symbiosis between them.
As you try to tweak your sleep one way or the other, you might be, you might be doing great - you might do better at remembering details of an event, but you might end up being poorer at abstracting the gist or the rules associated with it.
In order to shake a hypothesis, it is sometimes not necessary to do anything more than push it as far as it will go.
Science fiction writers aren't fortune tellers. Fortune tellers are fakes.
We have to have a combination of general relativity that describes the warping of space and time, and quantum physics, which describes the uncertainties in that warping and how they change.
Yes. I'm a doctor, an epidemiologist, and lots of my professional colleagues flip back and forth between industry and medical roles. I know them; they are not bad people. But it is possible for good people in bad systems to do things that inflict enormous harm.