Understanding vision and building visual systems is really understanding intelligence.
Fei-Fei LiRead
It is deeply against my principles to work on any project that I think is to weaponize AI.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes an ethical stance against using AI for harmful purposes.
Fei-Fei Li's quote reflects a strong moral conviction against the application of artificial intelligence in ways that could lead to harm or weaponization. She highlights the importance of guiding technology development toward beneficial uses rather than destructive ones, underscoring the ethical responsibilities of those who innovate in the AI field.
In practice
In a debate on the implications of AI, this quote highlights the importance of ethical considerations.
Understanding vision and building visual systems is really understanding intelligence.
I believe in the future of AI changing the world. The question is, who is changing AI? It is really important to bring diverse groups of students and future leaders into the development of AI.
I believe AI and its benefits have no borders. Whether a breakthrough occurs in Silicon Valley, Beijing, or anywhere else, it has the potential to make everyone's life better for the entire world.
AI-assisted driving is a perfect platform for advancing fundamental human-centric artificial intelligence research while also producing practical applications.
The tools and technologies we've developed are really the first few drops of water in the vast ocean of what AI can do.
Making AI more sensitive to the full scope of human thought is no simple task. The solutions are likely to require insights derived from fields beyond computer science, which means programmers will have to learn to collaborate more often with experts in other domains.
Any new technology, if it's used by evil people, bad things can happen. But that's more a question of the politics of the technology.
Human language is the new UI layer, bots are like new applications, and digital assistants are meta apps. Intelligence is infused into all of your interactions.
Considering what human beings do and have done to human beings (and to other living things as well) ... I can never imagine what the devil people think computers can add to the horrors.
Facebook succeeded because it was about real people having a presence on the Internet. There were all these other social networking sites people had, but they were all about fictional people.
So many people for so many years have promoted technology as the answer to everything. The economy wasn't growing: technology. Poor people: technology. Illness: technology. As if, somehow, technology in and of itself would be a solution. Yet machine values are not always human values.
To me, it looks more or less like the hardware designers have run out of ideas and that they're trying to pass the blame for the future demise of Moore's Law to the software writers by giving us machines that work faster only on a few key benchmarks!
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.