Although we work through financial markets, our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street.
Some degree of inequality in income and wealth, of course, would occur even with completely equal opportunity because variations in effort, skill, and luck will produce variations in outcomes.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Inequality in income and wealth is inevitable due to differences in individual effort, skills, and luck, even when everyone has the same opportunities.
Janet Yellen's quote highlights the reality that despite providing equal opportunities to all individuals, differences in personal effort, innate skills, and even elements of chance will lead to variations in their economic outcomes. This suggests that while equal opportunity is important for a fair society, it cannot fully eliminate the disparities that arise from individual circumstances and behaviors.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate about economic policies, you might use this quote to emphasize the complexity of addressing income inequality.
More from Janet Yellen
All quotes βWe need to keep in mind the well-established fact that the full effects of monetary policy are felt only after long lags. This means that policy makers cannot wait until they have achieved their objectives to begin adjusting policy.
A clear lesson of history is that a 'sine qua non' for sustained economic recovery following a financial crisis is a thoroughgoing repair of the financial system.
Transparency concerning the Federal Reserve's conduct of monetary policy is desirable because better public understanding enhances the effectiveness of policy. More important, however, is that transparent communications reflect the Federal Reserve's commitment to accountability within our democratic system of government.
For decades, the pace of technological change in manufacturing has outstripped that in the economy as a whole. And, so, firms - manufacturing firms - have found it easier to continue producing by - with - reducing their workforces.
Inequality has risen to the point that it seems to me worthwhile for the U.S. to seriously consider taking the risk of making our economy more rewarding for more of the people.
Similar quotes
Zoning laws making housing more expensive? That's less of a problem with a universal basic income and more of a reason to put money directly into people's hands.
We ask our companies to restructure; we ask employees to work more for less money because there is overproduction, but then we're unable to defend them from cheaper Chinese imports. We are insane.
Long experience, in the United States and in other advanced economies, has demonstrated that monetary policy is most successful when decisions are rendered independent of influence by elected officials.
Debt is a social and ideological construct, not a simple economic fact.
THE CORRECTION, when it finally came, was not an overnight bursting of a bubble but a much more gentle letdown, a year-long leakage of value from key financial markets, a contraction too gradual to generate headlines and too predictable to seriously hurt anybody but fools and the working poor.
No economy can succeed without a high-quality workforce, particularly in an age of globalization and technical change.