If we were to drive out the English with the weapons with which they enslaved us, our slavery would still be with us even when they have gone.
Mahatma GandhiRead
If we turn to the differences separating Communist, Fascist, and National Socialist regimes, we find that they can be accounted for by contrasting social, economic, and cultural condition in which the three had to operate. In other words, they resulted from tactical adaptation of the same philosophy of government to local circumstances, not from different philosophies.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Differences in totalitarian regimes arise from local conditions rather than distinct philosophies.
In this quote, Richard Pipes emphasizes that the varying forms of totalitarianism—Communism, Fascism, and National Socialism—are not fundamentally different in ideology. Instead, their distinctions stem from the specific social, economic, and cultural contexts in which they developed, demonstrating that similar governmental philosophies can lead to diverse manifestations based on local circumstances.
Themes
TotalitarianismPhilosophyGovernmentIdeologyContext
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on political theory, one could cite this quote to discuss how ideologies transform based on social conditions.
Similar quotes
Remembering the facts of death and Heaven gives us an even more pressing reason to learn to pray: We do not have an infinite amount of time. We are one day nearer Home today than we ever were before. I guarantee you that after you die you will not say 'I spent too much time praying; I wish I had watched more TV instead.'
Peter KreeftRead
The more I love humanity in general, the less I love man in particular.
Fyodor DostoevskyRead
We who are atheists are also a-fairyists, a-teapotists, and a-unicornists, but we don't have to bother saying so.
Richard DawkinsRead
In a certain sense all men are historians.
Thomas CarlyleRead
Perhaps it’s that you can’t go back in time, but you can return to the scenes of a love, of a crime, of happiness, and of a fatal decision; the places are what remain, are what you can possess, are what is immortal. They become the tangible landscape of memory, the places that made you, and in some way you too become them. They are what you can possess and in the end what possesses you.
Rebecca SolnitRead