And the distinction between violent and non-violent action is that the former is exclusively bent upon the destruction of the old, and the latter is chiefly concerned with the establishment of something new.
Interpretation
Violent action focuses on destroying the past, while non-violent action aims to create new beginnings.
In this quote, Hannah Arendt emphasizes the fundamental difference between violent and non-violent actions. She argues that violent actions are preoccupied with tearing down existing structures and realities, whereas non-violent actions seek to build and establish new possibilities and futures. This distinction highlights the transformative potential of non-violent approaches in contrast to the destructive nature of violence.
In practice
During a peace rally, one could mention this quote to highlight the importance of non-violent approaches.
A life spent entirely in public, in the presence of others, becomes, as we would say, shallow. While it retains its visibility, it loses its quality of rising into sight from some darker ground which must remain hidden if it is not to lose its depth in a very real, non-subjective sense.
Politically speaking, tribal nationalism [patriotism] always insists that its own people are surrounded by 'a world of enemies' - 'one against all' - and that a fundamental difference exists between this people and all others. It claims its people to be unique, individual, incompatible with all others, and denies theoretically the very possibility of a common mankind long before it is used to destroy the humanity of man.
We are wont to see friendship solely as a phenomenon of intimacy in which the friends open their hearts to each other unmolested by the world and its demands...Thus it is hard for us to understand the political relevance of friendship...But for the Greeks the essence of friendship consisted in discourse...The converse (in contrast to the intimate talk in which individuals speak about themselves), permeated though it may be by pleasure in the friend’s presence, is concerned with the common world.
Our tradition of political thought had its definite beginning in the teachings of Plato and Aristotle. I believe it came to a no less definite end in the theories of Karl Marx.
Even though we have lost yardsticks by which to measure, and rules under which to subsume the particular, a being whose essence is a beginning may have enough of origin within himself to understand without preconceived categories and to judge without the set of customary rules which is morality.
It is the nature of beginning that something new is started which cannot be expected from whatever may have happened before. This character of startling unexpectedness is inherent in all beginnings.
They ask me if I'm going to quit. I thought we were just getting started. We have a revolution to fight, a country to change.
If the National Football League, an organization notoriously known for not standing behind their athletes of color, can come out to make a statement to condemn racism and their systemic oppression and admit they were wrong for not listening in the past, then the 'Bachelor' franchise can most certainly follow suit.
America isn't Congress. America isn't Washington. America is the striving immigrant who starts a business, or the mom who works two low-wage jobs to give her kid a better life. America is the union leader and the CEO who put aside their differences to make the economy stronger.
We've reached the end of incrementalism. Only those companies that are capable of creating industry revolutions will prosper in the new economy.
All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.
We're going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.