In a perfect world what poor countries at the lowest rungs of economic development need is not a multi-party democracy, but in fact a decisive benevolent dictator to push through the reforms required to get the economy moving
Economics, as it is often taught today, portrays us as homo economicus-someone who doesn't vote in presidential elections, doesn't return lost wallets, and doesn't leave tips when dining out of town. Julie Nelson reminds us that most people aren't really like that. She helps point the way to a richer, more descriptive way of thinking about economic life.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote critiques the traditional economic model that depicts people as purely self-interested and rational. It emphasizes the need for a more nuanced understanding of human behavior in economic contexts.
Robert H. Frank's quote draws attention to the limitations of the conventional economic model which portrays individuals solely as rational actors driven by self-interest. He highlights how this simplistic view overlooks the complexities of human behavior, such as altruism and social responsibility, by referencing Julie Nelson's work, which advocates for a broader perspective that better mirrors real-world interactions in economic life. The essence of the quote encourages a deeper exploration of the motivations behind economic decisions, moving beyond the narrow assumptions of traditional economics.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about economic theories, one could use this quote to argue for the inclusion of humanistic approaches in economic models.
Similar quotes
No complaint... is more common than that of a scarcity of money.
Only government can take perfectly good paper, cover it with perfectly good ink and make the combination worthless.
The big bankers of the world, who practise the terrorism of money, are more powerful than kings and field marshals, even more than the Pope of Rome himself. They never dirty their hands. They kill no-one: they limit themselves to applauding the show.
Once you realize that trickle-down economics does not work, you will see the excessive tax cuts for the rick as what they are -- a simple upward redistribution of income, rather than a way to make all of us richer, as we were told.
Drug companies spend more on advertising and marketing than on research, more on research on lifestyle drugs than on life saving drugs, and almost nothing on diseases that affect developing countries only. This is not surprising. Poor people cannot afford drugs, and drug companies make investments that yield the highest returns.