In just one year in Bosnia, thirty of my colleagues died. There is a little Somme waiting for all innocent journalists.
Robert FiskRead
I suppose, in the end, we journalists try - or should try - to be the first impartial witnesses of history. If we have any reason for our existence, the least must be our ability to report history as it happens so that no one can say: 'we didn't know - no one told us.'
Interpretation
Journalists have a duty to report unbiased facts to inform the public about historical events.
In this quote, Robert Fisk emphasizes the vital role of journalists in society as impartial witnesses who document events as they unfold. He reflects on the responsibility that comes with this role, suggesting that the essence of journalism is to provide an accurate historical record that prevents citizens from claiming ignorance about significant occurrences.
In practice
This quote could be used in a speech about the importance of media freedom.
In just one year in Bosnia, thirty of my colleagues died. There is a little Somme waiting for all innocent journalists.
The [Israelis] believed - they were possessed of an absolute certainty and conviction - that 'terrorists' were in Chatila. How could I explain to them that the terrorists had left, that the terrorists had worn Israeli uniforms, that the terrorists had been sent into Chatila by Israeli officers, that the victims of the terrorists were not Israelis but Palestinians and Lebanese?
War is primarily not about victory or defeat but about death and the infliction of death. It represents the total failure of the human spirit.
U.S. journalists I don't think are very courageous. They tend to go along with the government's policy domestically and internationally. To question is seen as being unpatriotic, or potentially subversive.
The biggest problem I have in journalism is being quoted or misquoted and then being asked to defend something I haven't said.
There is nothing so satisfying as to be shot at without effect.
I have been asking if I'm an activist or a journalist. And my answer is very simple. I'm just a journalist who asks questions.
The Post-Dispatch will serve no party but the people; be no organ of Republicanism, but the organ of truth; will follow no causes bit its conclusions; will not support the Administration, but criticize it; will oppose all frauds and shams wherever or whatever they are; will advocate principles and ideas rather than prejudices and partisanship.
Journalism, some huge percentage of it, should be devoted to putting pressure on power, on nonsense, on chicanery of all kinds and if that's going to invite a lawsuit, well, bring it on.
The most important ethical issues and the most difficult ones are the human ones because a reporter has enormous power to hurt people.
As a journalist, I know what it is like to incur the self-righteous wrath of people who denounce you for things you didn't say or didn't mean.
I don't believe in these headline-hunting interviews. That's just not my style.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.