That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
Ernest RutherfordRead
The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.
Interpretation
Rutherford critiques the idea that nuclear energy can be a viable power source, suggesting it is unrealistic.
In this quote, Ernest Rutherford expresses skepticism about the potential of atomic energy as a feasible power source, describing it as 'moonshine'—a term implying that the ideas surrounding the transformation of atoms into energy are fanciful and impractical. He indicates that while nuclear reactions are scientifically fascinating, the application of this energy for practical power generation is misguided and not grounded in reality.
In practice
In a debate about renewable resources, one might reference Rutherford's skepticism about nuclear energy.
That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
I am a great believer in the simplicity of things and as you probably know I am inclined to hang on to broad & simple ideas like grim death until evidence is too strong for my tenacity.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
Now I know what the atom looks like.
If your result needs a statistician then you should design a better experiment.
Should a young scientist working with me come to me after two years of such work and ask me what to do next, I would advise him to get out of science. After two years of work, if a man does not know what to do next, he will never make a real scientist.
When I was 16 years old, I assembled a 2.3 million electron volt beta particle accelerator. I went to Westinghouse, I got 400 pounds of translator steel, 22 miles of copper wire, and I assembled a 6-kilowatt, 2.3 million electron accelerator in the garage.
Unfortunately what is little recognized is that the most worthwhile scientific books are those in which the author clearly indicates what he does not know; for an author most hurts his readers by concealing difficulties.
Mathematics compares the most diverse phenomena and discovers the secret analogies that unite them.
You see, proteins, as I probably needn't tell you, are immensely complicated groupings of amino acids and certain other specialized compounds, arranged in intricate three-dimensional patterns that are as unstable as sunbeams on a cloudy day. It is this instability that is life, since it is forever changing its position in an effort to maintain its identity--in the manner of a long rod balanced on an acrobat's nose.
To me there never has been a higher source of honour or distinction than that connected with advances in science. I have not possessed enough of the eagle in my character to make a direct flight to the loftiest altitudes in the social world; and I certainly never endeavored to reach those heights by using the creeping powers of the reptile, who in ascending, generally chooses the dirtiest path, because it is the easiest.
As a physicist, I've always found cosmology to be a rational elixir; it distances me from ordinary concerns.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.