One of the little-celebrated powers of Presidents (and other high government officials) is to listen to their critics with just enough sympathy to ensure their silence.
If you feed enough oats to the horse, some will pass through to feed the sparrows (referring to "trickle down" economics).
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote suggests that the benefits provided to the wealthy can eventually benefit those who are less fortunate.
John Kenneth Galbraith uses this metaphor to critique the idea of 'trickle-down' economics, arguing that while resources may be allocated to the wealthy, the benefits often do not reach those in need as effectively as proponents suggest. The image of feeding oats to a horse highlights the assumption that if the rich are nourished, the excess will trickle down to help the poor, but in reality, this process is often inadequate and leads to inequality.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on economic policy, one might use this quote to discuss the limitations of trickle-down economics.
More from John Kenneth Galbraith
All quotes βIf all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.
Money differs from an automobile or mistress in being equally important to those who have it and those who do not.
People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage.
Similar quotes
We ask our companies to restructure; we ask employees to work more for less money because there is overproduction, but then we're unable to defend them from cheaper Chinese imports. We are insane.
A healthy economy is largely a result of a reasonable balance between consumption today and consumption deferred, and it's pretty clear that balance has been ridiculously out of whack for a while.
Government control of the economy, no matter in whose behalf, has been the source of all the evils in our industrial society -- and the solution is laissez-faire capitalism, i.e., the abolition of any and all forms of intervention in production and trade, the separation of State and Economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of Church and State.
On the market, all is harmony. But as soon as intervention appears and is established, conflict is created, for each may participate in a scramble to be a net gainer rather than a net loser - to be part of the invading team instead of one of the victims.
What I did not know yet about hunger, but would find out over the next twenty-one years, was that brilliant theorists of economics do not find it worthwhile to spend time discussing issues of poverty and hunger. They believe that these will be resolved when general economic prosperity increases. These economists spend all their talents detailing the process of development and prosperity, but rarely reflect on the origin and development of poverty and hunger. A a result, poverty continues.
We can fight the global economy with a strong local economy.