But when I wasn't working, I was usually at a window looking down at Earth.
Sally RideRead
Even though NASA tries to simulate launch, and we practice in simulators, it's not the same - it's not even close to the same.
Interpretation
Experiencing real events cannot be truly replicated through simulations.
Sally Ride's quote emphasizes the profound difference between simulated experiences and actual events. While training and practice using simulators can prepare individuals for real situations, nothing can compare to the authenticity and intensity of the genuine experience, particularly in the context of space launches.
In practice
In a motivational speech about overcoming challenges, highlighting Sally Ride's quote can showcase the importance of real-life experiences.
But when I wasn't working, I was usually at a window looking down at Earth.
When the space shuttle's engines cut off, and you're finally in space, in orbit, weightless... I remember unstrapping from my seat, floating over to the window, and that's when I got my first view of Earth. Just a spectacular view, and a chance to see our planet as a planet.
All adventures, especially into new territory, are scary.
I did not come to NASA to make history.
Yes, I did feel a special responsibility to be the first American woman in space.
If we want scientists and engineers in the future, we should be cultivating the girls as much as the boys.
No amounts of stone and bone could yield the kinds of information that the paintings gave so freely.
The problem [with genetic research] is, we're just starting down this path, feeling our way in the dark. We have a small lantern in the form of a gene, but the lantern doesn't penetrate more than a couple of hundred feet. We don't know whether we're going to encounter chasms, rock walls or mountain ranges along the way. We don't even know how long the path is.
From all we have learnt about the structure of living matter, we must be prepared to find it working in a manner that cannot be reduced to the ordinary laws of physics. And that not on the ground that there is any 'new force' or what not, directing the behaviour of the single atoms within a living organism, but because the construction is different from anything we have yet tested in the physical laboratory.
The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less we can believe that it just happened by blind chance. Superficially, the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer.
Biology is now bigger than physics, as measured by the size of budgets, by the size of the workforce, or by the output of major discoveries; and biology is likely to remain the biggest part of science through the twenty-first century.
If you represent the Earth's lifetime by a single year, say from January when it was made to December, the 21st-century would be a quarter of a second in June - a tiny fraction of the year. But even in this concertinaed cosmic perspective, our century is very, very special: the first when humans can change themselves and their home planet.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.