The Internet offers endangered languages a chance to have a public voice in a way that would not have been possible before.
David CrystalRead
Ever since the arrival of printing - thought to be the invention of the devil because it would put false opinions into people's minds - people have been arguing that new technology would have disastrous consequences for language.
Interpretation
New technologies often face skepticism and fear regarding their impact on language and thought.
David Crystal's quote highlights the historical apprehension surrounding new technologies, particularly printing, which was once regarded as potentially harmful to societal discourse. This fear reflects a recurring theme in which innovations provoke fears about the distortion of language and the proliferation of misleading ideas, suggesting a complex relationship between technology and communication.
In practice
In a debate regarding the impact of social media on language, one might use this quote to illustrate historical fears of new communication forms.
The Internet offers endangered languages a chance to have a public voice in a way that would not have been possible before.
The main effect of the Internet on language has been to increase the expressive richness of language, providing the language with a new set of communicative dimensions that haven't existed in the past.
Bilingualism lets you have your cake and eat it. The new language opens the doors to the best jobs in society; the old language allows you to keep your sense of 'who you are.' It preserves your identity. With two languages, you have the best of both worlds.
Language has no independent existence apart from the people who use it. It is not an end in itself; it is a means to an end of understanding who you are and what society is like.
Enshrined in a language is the whole of a community's history and a large part of its cultural identity. The world is a mosaic of visions. To lose even one piece of this mosaic is a loss for all of us.
Every usage, no matter how bizarre or nonstandard, fascinates me, as it tells me something about the way language is evolving.
I don't subscribe to the view some people have in the industry that you should purposefully design products that do not last that long. I don't think it is good for anyone.
At one point in time, you had to choose, 'Do you want to do consumer or enterprise?' But the reality today is a bit different: Enterprises are a collection of consumers.
By 2029, computers will have emotional intelligence and be convincing as people.
The only way to make software secure, reliable, and fast is to make it small.
Because of its vitality, the computing field is always in desperate need of new cliches: Banality soothes our nerves.
I am living in the Google years, no question of that. And there are advantages to it. When you forget something, you can whip out your iPhone and go to Google. The Senior Moment has become the Google moment, and it has a much nicer, hipper, younger, more contemporary sound, doesn't it? By handling the obligations of the search mechanism, you almost prove you can keep up.... You can't retrieve you life (unless you're on Wikipedia, in which case you can retrieve an inaccurate version of it).
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.