The effect of that is to poison the flow of information to the President himself and to create a situation where a President can be almost, to use a metaphor, psychotically divorced from the realities in which he is acting.
Daniel EllsbergRead
EVERY attack now made on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange was made against me and the release of the Pentagon Papers at the time.
Interpretation
This quote reflects the idea of solidarity and shared struggle in the face of governmental scrutiny or attack.
Daniel Ellsberg emphasizes that attacks on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange are not just personal assaults but are broader attacks on the principle of transparency and accountability in government. By likening these current actions to those taken against him for the Pentagon Papers, Ellsberg highlights the historical continuity of the fight for whistleblower rights and the public's right to know.
In practice
In a speech about freedom of the press.
The effect of that is to poison the flow of information to the President himself and to create a situation where a President can be almost, to use a metaphor, psychotically divorced from the realities in which he is acting.
There should be at least one leak like the Pentagon Papers every year.
I felt that as an American citizen, as a responsible citizen, I could no longer cooperate in concealing this information from the American public. I did this clearly at my own jeopardy and I am prepared to answer to all the consequences of this decision.
I see Edward Snowden as someone who has chosen, at best, exile from the country he loves-with a serious risk of his assassination by agents of his government or life in prison (in solitary confinement)-to awaken us to the danger of our loss of democracy to a total-surveilla nce state
If there's another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in this country.
We were young, we were foolish, we were arrogant, but we were right.
Slavery is ...an atrocious debasement of human nature.
A good cause can become bad if we fight for it with means that are indiscriminately murderous. A bad cause can become good if enough people fight for it in a spirit of comradeship and self-sacrifice. In the end it is how you fight, as much as why you fight, that makes your cause good or bad.
We should cease to talk about vague and unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.
The trouble with righting some wrongs is that it makes the remaining ones seem even more unbearable.
The one thing that the racist can never manage is anything like discrimination: he is indiscriminate by definition.
The truth is I am inventing the maybe. I can only make the choices I make, so why torture myself with what I might have done, when all I can handle is what I have done? The Maybe Islands are hostile to human life.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.