To the extent that we even understand string theory, it may imply a massive number of possible different universes with different laws of physics in each universe, and there may be no way of distinguishing between them or saying why the laws of physics are the way they are. And if I can predict anything, then I haven't explained anything.
Interpretation
This quote discusses the complexities of string theory and the implications of multiple universes with varying physical laws.
Lawrence M. Krauss highlights the difficulties inherent in understanding string theory, suggesting that if it allows for numerous universes governed by different laws of physics, it complicates our ability to comprehend or explain the universe we inhabit. The statement also reflects a philosophical view on knowledge and understanding, indicating that true explanation should allow for predictions, rather than simply identifying possibilities.
In practice
This quote can be used in discussions about the nature of science at a physics conference.
The one experience that I hope every student has at some point in their lives is to have some belief you profoundly, deeply hold, proved to be wrong because that is the most eye-opening experience you can have, and as a scientist, to me, is the most exciting experience I can ever have.
If our species is to survive, our future will probably require outposts beyond our own planet.
The ultimate arbiter of truth is experiment, not the comfort one derives from one's a priori beliefs, nor the beauty or elegance one ascribes to one's theoretical models.
I cannot stress often enough that what science is all about is not proving things to be true but proving them to be false.
The illusion of purpose and design is perhaps the most pervasive illusion about nature that science has to confront on a daily basis.
The universe is the way it is , whether we like_x000D_ it or not. The existence or nonexistence of a creator is independent_x000D_ of our desires . A world without God or purpose may seem harsh_x000D_ or pointless, but that alone doesn ' t require God to actually exist.
And anyone who thinks they can talk about quantum theory without feeling dizzy hasn't yet understood the first thing about it.
In some sense, gravity does not exist; what moves the planets and the stars is the distortion of space and time.
No doubt science cannot admit of compromises, and can only bring out the complete truth. Hence there must be controversy, and the strife may be, and sometimes must be, sharp. But must it even then be personal? Does it help science to attack the man as well as the statement? On the contrary, has not science the noble privilege of carrying on its controversies without personal quarrels?
Wind power, if not properly planned and sited, can harm birds and bats (although Danish studies of 10,000 bird kills revealed that almost all died in collisions with buildings, cars and wires; only 10 were killed by windmills). Alternative energy sources are absolutely necessary. Global warming will kill birds and bats, as well as other species, in much greater numbers than wind power.
Do I get grief for the fact that in communicating, say, about the baboons I'm doing so much anthropomorphizing? One hopes that the parts that are blatantly ridiculous will be perceived as such. I've nonetheless been stunned by some of my more humorless colleagues - to see that they were not capable of recognizing that.
What is the difference between a 2°C world and a 4°C world? Human civilisation!
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.