Ideas are like rabbits. You get a couple and learn how to handle them, and pretty soon you have a dozen.
Free men cannot start a war, but once it is started, they can fight on in defeat. Herd men, followers of a leader, cannot do that, and so it is always the herd men who win battles and the free men who win wars.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote discusses the difference between independent thinkers and followers in the context of conflict and war.
John Steinbeck contrasts 'free men' and 'herd men' to illustrate that while free individuals may not initiate conflicts, they possess the resilience and depth to endure beyond immediate losses, thus ultimately shaping the broader outcome of wars. In contrast, herd men, who follow leaders without question, may achieve temporary victories in battles but lack the independence and vision required to win the larger, more significant wars, reflecting a profound commentary on leadership and human nature.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about leadership qualities, one might quote this to highlight the importance of independent thinking.
More from John Steinbeck
All quotes →At one point, as Samuel urges Adam to raise his boys well regardless of the blood that might be in them, Adam tells him, "You can't make a race horse of a pig." Samuel replies, "No, but you can make a very fast pig.
And when that crop grew, and was harvested, no man had crumbled a hot clod in his fingers and let the earth sift past his fingertips. No man had touched the seed, or lusted for the growth. Men ate what they had not raised, had no connection with the bread. The land bore under iron, and under iron gradually died; for it was not loved or hated, it had no prayers or curses.
The comfortable people in tight houses felt pity at first, and then distaste, and finally hatred for the migrant people.
People do not want advice - they want corroboration.
It is one of the triumphs of the human that he can know a thing and still not believe it.
Similar quotes
Not only the entire ability to think rests on language... but language is also the crux of the misunderstanding of reason with itself.
Grace can neither be bought, earned, or won by the creature. If it could be, it would cease to be grace.
Let there be nothing within thee that is not very beautiful and very gentle, and there will be nothing without thee that is not beautiful and softened by the spell of thy presence.
The difference between theism and nontheism is not whether one does or does not believe in God. . . Theism is a deep-seated conviction that there's some hand to hold: if we just do the right things, someone will appreciate us and take care of us. . . Nontheism is relaxing with the ambiguity and uncertainty of the present moment without reaching for anything to protect ourselves.
Yes; poor Bunbury is a dreadful invalid. Well, I must say, Algernon, that I think it is high time that Mr. Bunbury made up his mind whether he was going to live or to die. This shillyshallying with the question is absurd.
The brain seems a thoroughfare for nerve-action passing its way to the motor animal. It has been remarked that Life's aim is an act not a thought. To-day the dictum must be modified to admit that, often, to refrain from an act is no less an act than to commit one, because inhibition is coequally with excitation a nervous activity.