The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
Saul AlinskyRead
A free and open society is an ongoing conflict, interrupted periodically by compromises.
Interpretation
A free society thrives on continual debate and negotiation, which shape its evolution.
Saul Alinsky's quote highlights the inherent nature of a free and open society as being characterized by constant conflict over ideals, values, and governance. This ongoing struggle is interspersed with moments of compromise that allow society to move forward, reflecting that progress often requires balancing differing perspectives and interests to maintain freedom and openness.
In practice
This quote could be used in a discussion about the challenges of democratic governance in a political science class.
The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
Lest we forget at least an over the shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins - or which is which), the very first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom - Lucifer.
The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns.... All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.
The threat is generally more terrifying than the thing itself.
Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.
I silently laugh at my own cenotaph,_x000D_ And out of the caverns of rain,_x000D_ Like a child from the womb, like a ghost from the tomb,_x000D_ I arise and unbuild it again.
Public behavior is merely private character writ large.
The clear problem of the outlawing of insult is that too many things can be interpreted as such. Criticism, ridicule, sarcasm, merely stating an alternative point of view to the orthodoxy, can be interpreted as insult.
The few surviving Armenians no longer ask to go home. They do not ask for restitution. They ask simply to have the memory of their obliteration acknowledged. It is a moral obsession, the lonely legacy passed onto the third and fourth generation who no longer speak Armenian but who carry within them the seeds of resentment that will not be quashed.
Religious doctrines β¦ are all illusions, they do not admit of proof, and no one can be compelled to consider them as true or to believe in them.
The point of literary criticism in anthropology is not to replace research, but to find out how it is that we are persuasive.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.