Afghanistan's borders are arbitrary, drawn to meet 19th-century political needs rather than to respect ethnic or religious patterns.
Stephen KinzerRead
After installing friendly leaders in Iran and Guatemala, the United States lost interest in promoting democracy in either country.
Interpretation
This quote highlights how the U.S. prioritized its interests over democratic values in foreign affairs.
Stephen Kinzer's quote reflects on the actions of the United States in Iran and Guatemala, suggesting that once the U.S. established leadership in these countries that aligned with its interests, it ceased to advocate for their democratic development. This raises questions about the true motivation behind foreign interventions and the genuine commitment to democracy.
In practice
During a lecture on international relations, this quote can illustrate the complexities of U.S. foreign policy.
Afghanistan's borders are arbitrary, drawn to meet 19th-century political needs rather than to respect ethnic or religious patterns.
Guerrilla leaders win wars by being paranoid and ruthless. Once they take power, they are expected to abandon those qualities and embrace opposite ones: tolerance, compromise and humility. Almost none manages to do so.
Rwanda has emerged from the devastation of genocide and become more secure and prosperous than anyone had a right to expect.
Accepting that Arabs have the right to elect their own leaders means accepting the rise of governments that do not share America's pro-Israel militancy.
Want to depose the government of a poor country with resources? Want to bash Muslims? Want to build support for American military interventions around the world? Want to undermine governments that are raising their people up from poverty because they don't conform to the tastes of Upper West Side intellectuals? Use human rights as your excuse!
Every nation, like every individual, would like to believe it owes 'no apology' to anyone. Adults realise, however, that few among us are purely innocent or utterly blameless.
There may be circumstances in which damaging our relationship with countries over human rights is counterproductive and the benefits to human rights may be very small because of our limited capacity to enforce our stance. That was the dilemma the United States faced after Tiananmen Square.
If you remove the English Army tomorrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin Castle., unless you set about the organization of the Socialist Republic your efforts will be in vain. England will still rule you. She would rule you through her capitalists, through her landlords, through her financiers, through the whole array of commercial and individualist institutions she has planted in this country and watered with the tears of our mothers and the blood of our martyrs
Israel must never be expected to jeopardize her security: if she was ever foolish enough to do so, and then suffered for it, the backlash against both honest brokers and Palestinians would be immense - 'land for peace' must also bring peace.
America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.
One person alone can't do anything as important as bringing genuine democracy to a country.
The hardest thing about any political campaign is how to win without proving that you are unworthy of winning.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.