To maximise global social welfare, policymakers should strongly encourage the diffusion of knowledge from developed to developing countries.
Interpretation
Promoting the spread of knowledge from wealthy to poorer nations can improve overall global welfare.
Joseph Stiglitz emphasizes the importance of knowledge transfer from developed countries to developing ones as a crucial step towards maximizing global social welfare. By facilitating this diffusion of knowledge, policymakers can help empower developing nations, improve their socio-economic conditions, and contribute to a more equitable world.
In practice
In a conference on global education, Stiglitz's quote could be used to emphasize the need for knowledge-sharing initiatives.
Free migration within Europe means that countries that have done a better job at reducing unemployment will predictably end up with more than their fair share of refugees. Workers in these countries bear the cost in depressed wages and higher unemployment, while employers benefit from cheaper labor.
I don't think we can have democracies that work where most of the people are not benefiting economically, where most of the people are worried about their job security.
Let me put it very forcefully: No large economy has ever recovered from an economic downturn through austerity. It's not going to happen in the United States, and it's not going to happen in Europe.
What separates developing countries from developed countries is as much a gap in knowledge as a gap in resources.
One of the arguments I make for the failure of the euro is that, at the time it was being constructed, there was a 'neo-liberal' ideology which said that all we need to do to make this thing work is to get deficits low, keep inflation low, and take down barriers, and then everything would be fine.
Trump sees the world in terms of a zero-sum game. In reality, globalisation, if well managed, is a positive-sum force: America gains if its friends and allies - whether Australia, the E.U., or Mexico - are stronger. But Trump's approach threatens to turn it into a negative-sum game: America will lose, too.
You must get an education. You must go to school, and you must learn to protect yourself. And you must learn to protect yourself with the pen, and not the gun.
I think books are like people, in the sense that they'll turn up in your life when you most need them.
Long before I wrote stories, I listened for stories. Listening for them is something more acute than listening to them. I suppose itβs an early form of participation in what goes on. Listening children know stories are there. When their elders sit and begin, children are just waiting and hoping for one to come out, like a mouse from its hole.
I read comics and I did science, and never really put them together until I accidentally found myself in the middle of one.
I consider that a man's brain originally is like a little empty attic, and you have to stock it with such furniture as you choose.
I believe there should be breakfast, lunch and afternoon snack, all for free and for every child that goes to school. And all food that is good, clean and fair.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.