The death of the spirit is the price of progress.
Gnostic politics is self-defeating in so far as its disregard for the structure of reality leads to continuous warfare.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote suggests that ignoring the fundamental structure of reality in politics ultimately results in conflict and division.
Eric Voegelin's quote highlights the inherent flaw in Gnostic politics, which implies a deep-seated belief that the world can be fundamentally changed according to one's ideals, disregarding the actual complexities of reality. This disconnection from the truth fosters a cycle of continuous warfare, as ideological rigidity clashes with the multifaceted nature of existence, leading to persistent strife rather than constructive change.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a discussion on political ideologies, one might say, 'As Voegelin pointed out, Gnostic politics leads to endless conflict due to its rejection of reality.'
More from Eric Voegelin
All quotes →Similar quotes
One of the biggest problems with the world today is that we have large groups of people who will accept whatever they hear on the grapevine, just because it suits their worldview—not because it is actually true or because they have evidence to support it. The really striking thing is that it would not take much effort to establish validity in most of these cases… but people prefer reassurance to research.
By doubting we are led to question, by questioning we arrive at the truth.
Any group of persons – prisoners, primitives, pilots, or patients – develop a life of their own that becomes meaningful, reasonable and normal once you get close to it.
War is not merely a political act but a real political instrument, a continuation of political intercourse, a carrying out of the same by other means.
Most people catch their presuppositions from their family and surrounding society the way a child catches measles. But people with more understanding realize that their presuppositions should be chosen after a careful consideration of what world-view is true.
The argument is made that naming God is never really naming God but only naming our understanding of God. To take our ideas of the divine and hold them as if they correspond to the reality of God is thus to construct a conceptual idol built from the materials of our mind.