Progress is possible only if we train ourselves to think about programs without thinking of them as pieces of executable code.
In the good old days physicists repeated each other's experiments, just to be sure. Today they stick to FORTRAN, so that they can share each other's programs, bugs included.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Dijkstra critiques the modern reliance on programming over peer verification in physics.
In this quote, Edsger Dijkstra contrasts the collaborative nature of past physics experiments, where physicists would reproduce each other's experiments to validate results, with the current trend of relying solely on programming languages like FORTRAN. He suggests that while modern methods allow for sharing of code, they also carry the risk of sharing existing errors, which may detract from the rigor and trustworthiness that repeated experimental verification once provided.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the importance of reproducibility in scientific research, this quote serves as a reminder of the value of traditional experimental methods.
More from Edsger Dijkstra
All quotes βSimplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
The purpose of abstraction is not to be vague, but to create a new semantic level in which one can be absolutely precise.
We shall do a much better programming job, provided that we approach the task with a full appreciation of its tremendous difficulty, provided that we stick to modest and elegant programming languages, provided that we respect the intrinsic limitations of the human mind and approach the task as Very Humble Programmers.
The tools we use have a profound and devious influence on our thinking habits, and therefore on our thinking abilities.
LISP has jokingly been described as "the most intelligent way to misuse a computer." I think that description is a great compliment because it transmits the full flavour of liberation: it has assisted a number of our most gifted fellow humans in thinking previously impossible thoughts.
Similar quotes
Global warming is controversial, of course, but the controversy is mainly over whether human activity is driving it.
Taking bold action on climate change simply makes good business sense. It's also the right thing to do for people and the planet. Setting a net-zero GHG emissions target by 2050 will drive innovation, grow jobs, build prosperity, and secure a better world for what will soon be 9 billion people.
I am mindful that scientific achievement is rooted in the past, is cultivated to full stature by many contemporaries and flourishes only in favorable environment. No individual is alone responsible for a single stepping stone along the path of progress, and where the path is smooth progress is most rapid. In my own work this has been particularly true.
Astronomers can look back in time. We can look at things as they used to be. We have an idea there was a Big Bang explosion 13.7 billion years ago. We have a story of how galaxies and stars were made. It's an amazing story.
Chemistry... is like the maid occupied with daily civilisation; she is busy with fertilisers, medicines, glass, insecticides ... for she dispenses the recipes.
I assert that the cosmic religious experience is the strongest and the noblest driving force behind scientific research.