More than ever before in history, individuals can now band together to solve grand challenges. We face enormous problems, but we 'as individuals' have enormous power to solve them.
Peter DiamandisRead
If the government regulates against use of drones or stem cells or artificial intelligence, all that means is that the work and the research leave the borders of that country and go someplace else.
Interpretation
Restricting technological advancements will only push innovation to other countries.
This quote by Peter Diamandis highlights the potential consequences of government regulations on emerging technologies such as drones, stem cells, and artificial intelligence. Instead of fostering innovation within their own borders, restrictive policies may instead drive researchers and businesses to conduct their work elsewhere, thereby hindering a country's own progress and competitive edge in critical fields of science and technology.
In practice
In a discussion about how regulatory policies impact technological advancements at a tech conference.
More than ever before in history, individuals can now band together to solve grand challenges. We face enormous problems, but we 'as individuals' have enormous power to solve them.
I have the general philosophy of creating the future you want to see.
I was seeing a lot of entrepreneurs who were effectively working on the next photo-sharing app. I wanted to inspire them to go much bigger, bolder and more significant than that.
The world's biggest problems are the world's biggest market opportunities. And that's a huge thing. Solve hunger, literacy and energy problems, get the gratitude of the world and become a billionaire in the process.
You need to be a little crazy to change the world, and you can’t really fake it.
Did you know that Kodak actually invented the digital camera that ultimately put it out of business? Kodak had the patents and a head start, but ignored all that.
In fourth grade, I was interested in all areas of science. I particularly loved learning about how the earth was created.
Well, biology today as I see it has an amiable look - quite different from the 19th-century view that the whole arrangement of nature is hostile, 'red in tooth and claw.' That came about because people misread Darwin's 'survival of the fittest.'
I enjoy science, and I'm a very curious person. I always want to know the reason behind everything, big or small.
One of the pleasures of looking at the world through mathematical eyes is that you can see certain patterns that would otherwise be hidden.
I'm convinced that a controlled disrespect for authority is essential to a scientist. All the good experimental physicists I have known have had an intense curiosity that no Keep Out sign could mute. Physicists do, of course, show a healthy respect for High Voltage, Radiation, and Liquid Hydrogen signs. They are not reckless. I can think of only six who have been killed on the job.
The facts will eventually test all our theories, and they form, after all, the only impartial jury to which we can appeal.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.