It takes so long to train a physicist to the place where he understands the nature of physical problems that he is already too old to solve them.
Eugene WignerRead
The great mathematician fully, almost ruthlessly, exploits the domain of permissible reasoning and skirts the impermissible. That his recklessness does not lead him into a morass of contradictions is a miracle in itself: certainly it is hard to believe that our reasoning power was brought, by Darwin's process of natural selection, to the perfection which it seems to possess.
Interpretation
The quote reflects on the remarkable nature of human reasoning and its evolution through natural selection.
Eugene Wigner highlights the extraordinary talent of mathematicians and scientists who navigate the boundaries of logical reasoning. He marvels at how their ability to reason, which appears nearly flawless, could have evolved from a process like Darwinian natural selection, suggesting that it is a remarkable feat that they do not often fall into contradictions despite their bold explorations of thought.
In practice
During a lecture on the philosophical implications of mathematics, one might quote Wigner to emphasize the interplay of logic and creativity.
It takes so long to train a physicist to the place where he understands the nature of physical problems that he is already too old to solve them.
It was not possible to formulate the laws of quantum mechanics in a fully consistent way without reference to the consciousness.
The full meaning of life, the collective meaning of all human desires, is fundamentally a mystery beyond our grasp. As a young man, I chafed at this state of affairs. But by now I have made peace with it. I even feel a certain honor to be associated with such a mystery.
The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve.
The simplicities of natural laws arise through the complexities of the language we use for their expression.
The unreasonable efficiency of mathematics in science is a gift we neither understand nor deserve.
It was unthinkable not long ago that a biologist or paleontologist would be at the same conference as an astrophysicist. Now we have accumulated so much data in each of these branches of science as it relates to origins that we have learned that no one discipline can answer questions of origins alone.
Geometry is the only science that it hath pleased God hitherto to bestow on mankind.
From a certain temperature on, the molecules 'condense' without attractive forces; that is, they accumulate at zero velocity. The theory is pretty, but is there some truth in it.
New knowledge has led to the recognition in the theory of evolution of more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in itself a significant argument in favor of this theory.
We are survival machines β robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes. This is a truth which still fills me with astonishment.
Science is a way of getting knowledge. It's a method. It's a method that really relies on making mistakes. We propose ideas, they are usually wrong, and we test them against the data. Scientists do this in a formal way. It's a way that everyone can go through life; that's how we should be teaching science from a very young age.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.