An hour's history of two minds is well told in a game of chess.
The great World Champions Morphy, Steinitz, and Lasker were past masters in the art of Pawn play; they had no superiors in their handling of endgames. The present World Champion has not the strength of the other three as an endgame player, and is therefore inferior to them.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the mastery of past world chess champions in endgame strategies, suggesting that the current champion lacks their skill in this crucial aspect of the game.
Jose Raul Capablanca emphasizes the significance of endgame skills in chess, stating that legendary players like Morphy, Steinitz, and Lasker excelled in pawn play and endgame techniques. He argues that the current champion, while perhaps strong in other areas, does not match the historical giants in their ability to navigate the complexities of endgames, marking a fundamental difference in their overall chess prowess.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a chess class to emphasize the importance of mastering endgames.
More from Jose Raul Capablanca
All quotes →A passed pawn increase in strength as the number of pieces on the board diminishes.
Chess books should be used as we use glasses: to assist the sight, although some players make use of them as if they thought they conferred sight
Sultan Khan had become champion of India at Indian chess and he learned the rules of our form of chess at a later date. The fact that even under such conditions he succeeded in becoming champion reveals a genius for chess which is nothing short of extraordinary.
Chess is something more than a game. It is an intellectual diversion which has certain artistic qualities and many scientific elements.
The game might be divided into three parts, the opening, the middle-game and the end-game. There is one thing you must strive for, to be equally efficient in the three parts.
Similar quotes
And the good writer chooses his words for their 'meaning', but that meaning is not a a set, cut-off thing like the move of knight or pawn on a chess-board. It comes up with roots, with associations, with how and where the word is familiarly used, or where it has been used brilliantly or memorably.
But the thing that was great about Capablanca was that he really spoke his mind, he said what he believed was true, he said what he felt. He [Capablanca] wanted to change the rules [of chess] already, back in the twenties, because he said chess was getting played out. He was right. Now chess is completely dead. It is all just memorisation and prearrangement. It's a terrible game now. Very uncreative.
Capablanca was snatched too early from the chess world. With his death we have lost a great chess genius, the like of whom we will never see again.
The physicist is like someone who's watching people playing chess and, after watching a few games, he may have worked out what the moves in the game are. But understanding the rules is just a trivial preliminary on the long route from being a novice to being a grand master. So even if we understand all the laws of physics, then exploring their consequences in the everyday world where complex structures can exist is a far more daunting task, and that's an inexhaustible one I'm sure.
Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire.
You know, comrade Pachman, I don't enjoy being a Minister, I would rather play chess like you, or make a revolution in Venezuela.