I will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice.
Interpretation
The quote expresses a commitment to unwavering honesty and justice.
William Lloyd Garrison emphasizes the importance of being true to oneself and principled in oneβs beliefs. By claiming he will be as harsh as truth and uncompromising as justice, Garrison underscores the necessity of honesty and fairness in both personal and societal actions, suggesting that true progress and integrity can only come from an unyielding adherence to these ideals.
In practice
During a debate on ethics, one might use this quote to emphasize the importance of honesty in discussions.
Our country is the world, our countrymen are all mankind. We love the land of our nativity, only as we love all other lands. The interests, rights, and liberties of American citizens are no more dear to us than are those of the whole human race. Hence we can allow no appeal to patriotism, to revenge any national insult or injury.
Surely, nothing can be more dangerous than the doctrine that the moral obligations of men change with the latitude and longitude of a place.
I do not believe that God has created us under this dire necessity to toil, like beasts, to sustain life. I believe it is his will that we should hold absolute mastery over time, so as to devote it mainly to intellectual and moral improvement, domestic enjoyment, and social intercourse.
If the State cannot survive the anti-slavery agitation, then let the State perish. If the Church must be cast down by the strugglings of Humanity to be free, then let the Church fall and its fragments be scattered to the four winds of Heaven, never more to curse the earth.
Has not the experience of two centuries shown that gradualism in theory is perpetuity in practice? Is there an instance, in the history of the world, where slaves have been educated for freedom by their task-masters?
The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead.
Are people the best judges of their own happiness, or outsiders? In defining happiness, should we think of entire lives or of shorter periods such as moments, days, or years? And to what extent are virtue and happiness linked?
We are all familiar with the argument: Make war dreadful enough, and there will be no war. And we none of us believe it.
I hold the most archaic values on earth ... the fertility of the soul, the magic of the animals, the power-vision in solitude.... the love and ecstasy of the dance, the common work of the tribe.
Should we say the self, once perceived, becomes the soul?
The first sign of corruption in a society that is still alive is that the end justifies the means.
Privacy about giving is counterproductive. There is solid scientific research showing that people are more likely to give if they can see that others are giving. The richest people, in particular, should be setting an example.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.