In a few years, men will be able to communicate more effectively through a machine than face to face. That is a rather startling thing to say, but it is our conclusion.
The hope is that, in not too many years, human brains and computing machines will be coupled together very tightly, and that the resulting partnership will think as no human brain has ever thought and process data in a way not approached by the information-handling machines we know today.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote expresses the potential for a close partnership between human intelligence and computers to revolutionize thinking and data processing.
J. C. R. Licklider's quote highlights the optimism surrounding the future of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. He envisions a time when human brains and computing machines work closely together to achieve unprecedented levels of thought and data processing, suggesting a transformative impact on how we understand and manage information.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a conference on technology, one might say, 'As J. C. R. Licklider suggested, the combination of human and computer thought processes will lead us to new horizons.'
More from J. C. R. Licklider
All quotes →Similar quotes
In many ways, I am very happy about the whole Linux commercial market because the commercial market is doing all these things that I have absolutely zero interest in doing myself.
It is the triumph of civilization that at last communities have obtained such a mastery over natural laws that they drive and control them. The winds, the water, electricity, all aliens that in their wild form were dangerous, are now controlled by human will, and are made useful servants.
That has always been the objective of Apple: to do things that really enrich people's lives. That you look back on and you wonder, 'How did I live without this?'
The Internet allows the small guy a global marketplace. But technology is harmful in the sense that we get too much information from it. Because of the web we get 10 times the amount of noise we ever got, which makes harmful fallacies far more likely.
The critical question is: How do we ensure that the Internet develops in a way that is compatible with democracy?
A programming language is for thinking about programs, not for expressing programs you've already thought of. It should be a pencil, not a pen.