I am truly free only when all human beings, men and women, are equally free. The freedom of other men, far from negating or limiting my freedom, is, on the contrary, its necessary premise and confirmation.
Mikhail BakuninRead
The idea of God implies the abdication of human reason and justice; it is the most decisive negation of human liberty and necessarily ends in the enslavement of mankind both in theory and practice.
Interpretation
This quote critiques the concept of God as a hindrance to human freedom and rational thought.
Mikhail Bakunin argues that the belief in God undermines human reason and justice, leading to the oppression of humanity. He suggests that the idea of a divine authority removes individual liberties and promotes a form of enslavement, both conceptually and in practice, implying that reliance on God stifles human potential and rational thought.
In practice
During a debate on religion and ethics, one might quote this to emphasize the importance of reason over divine authority.
I am truly free only when all human beings, men and women, are equally free. The freedom of other men, far from negating or limiting my freedom, is, on the contrary, its necessary premise and confirmation.
We must overthrow the material and moral conditions of our present-day life. . . . We must first purify our atmosphere and completely transform the milieu in which we live; for it corrupts our instinct and our will, and constricts our heart and our intelligence
The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual.
By striving to do the impossible, man has always achieved what is possible. Those who have cautiously done no more than they believed possible have never taken a single step forward.
By striving to do the impossible, man has always achieved what is possible.
This contradiction lies here: they wish God, and they wish humanity. They persist in connecting two terms which, once separated, can come together again only to destroy each other.
But, in fact, materialism is among the most problematic of philosophical standpoints, the most impoverished in its explanatory range, and among the most willful and (for want of a better word) magical in its logic, even if it has been in fashion for a couple of centuries or more.
The western mindset erroneously equates a political system of multi-party democracy with high-quality institutions... the two are not synonymous.
The true felicity of life is to be free from anxieties and pertubations; to understand and do our duties to God and man, and to enjoy the present without any serious dependence on the future.
However insignificant the minority, and however trifling the proposed trespass against their rights, no such trespass is permissible.
As you know, when Star Trek was canceled after the second season, it was the activism of the fans that revived it for a third season.
Of what use is a philosopher who doesn't hurt anybody's feelings?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.