The regret on our side is, they used to say years ago, we are reading about you in science class. Now they say, we are reading about you in history class.
Neil ArmstrongRead
I'm substantially concerned about the policy directions of the space agency. We have a situation in the U.S. where the White House and Congress are at odds over what the future direction should be. They're sort of playing a game and NASA is the shuttlecock that they're hitting back and forth.
Interpretation
Neil Armstrong expresses concern over the conflicting policies affecting NASA's future.
In this quote, Neil Armstrong highlights the troubling dynamics between the White House and Congress, depicting NASA caught in the middle of a political tug-of-war. He likens NASA to a shuttlecock, being tossed around by the competing interests of government leadership, suggesting that without a clear consensus, the agency's ability to progress is severely hampered.
In practice
Use this quote in a discussion about the importance of bipartisan support for scientific agencies.
The regret on our side is, they used to say years ago, we are reading about you in science class. Now they say, we are reading about you in history class.
Pilots take no special joy in walking: pilots like flying.
Here men from the planet Earth first set foot upon the Moon. July 1969 AD. We came in peace for all mankind.
I believe every human has a finite number of heartbeats. I don't intend to waste any of mine.
I am, and ever will be, a white socks, pocket protector, nerdy engineer.
This is one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.
I miss the early days; I do. I was so lucky. I basically had it to myself, learning about these chimpanzees. Nobody knew anything about them. Discovering their different personalities, different life histories. I was lucky.
The noble science of Geology loses glory from the extreme imperfection of the record. The crust of the earth with its embedded remains must not be looked at as a well-filled museum, but as a poor collection made at hazard and at rare intervals.
Science isn't just about solving this or that puzzle. It's about understanding how the world works: the whole world from the vastness of the cosmos to the particularity of an individual human life. It's worth thinking about how all the different ways we have to talk about the world manage to fit together.
A cardinal principle that we must not stray from - no exceptions - is that your genetic information is your business in terms of who sees it. Nobody should be gaining access to that information without your explicit permission, and nobody should be requiring you to take a genetic test unless you decide that that's what you want to do.
The shelves of many evangelicals are full of books that point out the flaws in evolution, discuss it only as a theory, and almost imply that there's a conspiracy here to avoid the fact that evolution is actually flawed. All of those books, unfortunately, are based upon conclusions that no reasonable biologist would now accept.
If you think that the distance from the Earth to the nearest planet where we could live comfortably... is being, like, from New York to Australia... what we've achieved so far, in going to the moon, that's about two-and-a-half inches. So that's the challenge.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.