To say 'I love you' one must first be able to say the 'I.'
Ayn RandRead
Why is it immoral for you to desire, but moral for others to do so? Why is it immoral to produce a value and keep it, but moral to give it away? And if it is not moral for you to keep a value, why is it moral for others to accept it? If you are selfless and virtuous when you give it, are they not selfish and vicious when they take it?
Interpretation
The quote questions the morality of selflessness versus selfishness in the dynamics of value and desire.
Ayn Rand challenges the conventional notions of morality that dictate when it is acceptable to desire or keep the fruits of one's labor. She argues that if it is deemed immoral for one person to desire or retain value, then how can it be seen as moral for others to benefit from that decision? This perspective prompts readers to examine the inconsistencies in social and moral expectations regarding selflessness and profit.
In practice
In a debate about ethics in economics, this quote can highlight the paradox of value distribution.
To say 'I love you' one must first be able to say the 'I.'
The difference between animals and humans is that animals change themselves for the environment, but humans change the environment for themselves.
It is my eyes which see, and the sight of my eyes grants beauty to the earth. It is my ears which hear, and the hearing of my ears gives its song to the world. It is my mind which thinks, and the judgement of my mind is the only searchlight that can find the truth. It is my will which chooses, and the choice of my will is the only edict I must respect.
What is the basic, the essential, the crucial principle that differentiates freedom from slavery? It is the principle of voluntary action versus physical coercion or compulsion.
One method of destroying a concept is by diluting its meaning. Observe that by ascribing rights to the unborn, i.e., the nonliving, the anti-abortionists obliterate the rights of the living.
I think that when in doubt about the truth of an issue, it's safer and in better taste to select the least numerous of the adversaries.
Civil war.... What did the words mean? Was there any such thing as "foreign war"? Was not all warfare between men warfare between brothers?
But the fact a person denies that he is theorising is no reason for taking him at his word and failing to investigate what implicit theory is involved in his statements.
Man may be defined as the animal that can say ''I,'' that can be aware of himself as a separate entity.
We are finite and God will not call us everywhere or to support every worthy cause. And real needs are not far from us.
Gay or straight? So what? It doesn't matter to me. We have to be concerned about other people regardless.
Ever-newer waters flow on those who step into the same rivers.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.