It is not unprofessional to give free legal advice, but advertising that the first visit will be free is a bit like a fox telling chickens he will not bite them until they cross the threshold of the hen house.
Warren E. BurgerRead
It is indeed an odd business that it has taken this Court nearly two centuries to discover a constitutional mandate to have counsel at a preliminary hearing.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the surprising delay in recognizing the constitutional right to legal counsel at preliminary hearings.
Warren E. Burger's statement reflects his astonishment at how long it has taken the judicial system to acknowledge a fundamental right within the constitution. He critiques the legal system for its slowness to ensure that all individuals have the support of legal representation, especially at critical early stages of judicial proceedings, which is essential for fair legal processing.
In practice
This quote can be used in a legal seminar discussing the importance of legal representation.
It is not unprofessional to give free legal advice, but advertising that the first visit will be free is a bit like a fox telling chickens he will not bite them until they cross the threshold of the hen house.
The notion that most people want black-robed judges, well-dressed lawyers and fine-paneled courtrooms as the setting to resolve their disputes is not correct. People with problems, like people with pains, want relief, and they want it as quickly and inexpensively as possible.
[No one will be able to] deter the scientific mind from probing into the unknown any more than Canute could command the tides.
Industrialised countries must take the responsibility of helping poorer countries in the climate change action plan.
I understood at a young age that administrations come and go, but laws stay. So I decided to become a lawyer in order to help create a more just and peaceful world, not just in a fleeting moment but in a way that will endure from one generation to the next.
But I really think it's a very unfortunate part of our judicial system and I would feel much, much better if more states would really consider whether they think the benefits outweigh the very serious potential injustice, because in these cases the emotions are very, very high on both sides and to have stakes as high as you do in these cases, there is a special potential for error. We cannot ignore the fact that in recent years a disturbing number of inmates on death row have been exonerated.
Terrorism does not disappear with revenge tactics but through making justice and equality before law a reality.
If you're not thinking about the way systemic bias can be propagated through the criminal justice system or predictive policing, then it's very likely that, if you're designing a system based on historical data, you're going to be perpetuating those biases.
Lack of lawful access certainly affects our ability to do our jobs, but we know where the harm really falls when evidence is kept unavailable - it falls on innocent people, the people we're sworn to protect.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.