How we put our collective talents to work is a social issue, not solely a personal one.
Clay ShirkyRead
What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units - the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging - free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints - seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
Interpretation
The quote discusses the evolution of information organization through organic methods like tagging, emphasizing the value found in messy data sets.
In this quote, Clay Shirky reflects on the future of organizing information, moving away from rigid categorization to a more fluid and organic method centered around links and tags. He suggests that while free-form tagging may seem chaotic and prone to failure, it has the potential to uncover valuable insights from complex data, as demonstrated by the workings of the Web, which thrives on the richness and unpredictability of user-generated content.
In practice
In a tech conference discussing the future of data management.
How we put our collective talents to work is a social issue, not solely a personal one.
Curation comes up when people realize that it isn’t just about information seeking, it’s also about synchronizing a community.
It is our misfortune, as a historical generation, to live through the largest expansion in expressive capability in human history, a misfortune because abundance breaks more things than scarcity.
It is possible to think that the Internet will be a net positive for society while admitting that there are significant downsides - after all, it's not a revolution if nobody loses.
Wikipedia took the idea of peer review and applied it to volunteers on a global scale, becoming the most important English reference work in less than 10 years. Yet the cumulative time devoted to creating Wikipedia, something like 100 million hours of human thought, is expended by Americans every weekend, just watching ads.
If someone around you is multitasking, you pick up distraction like second-hand smoke.
Digital presentation is just television in public; we're all just getting together and watching TV without pointing the remote control at the screen.
Coding is like writing, and we live in a time of the new industrial revolution. What's happened is that maybe everybody knows how to use computers, like they know how to read, but they don't know how to write.
Think about technological float: it took centuries for the wheel to gain universal acceptance. Now any microchip device can be in use around the world in weeks.
Technology is not an image of the world but a way of operating on reality. The nihilism of technology lies not only in the fact that it is the most perfect expression of the will to power... but also in the fact that it lacks meaning.
The future is green energy, sustainability, renewable energy.
I think that technologies are morally neutral until we apply them. It's only when we use them for good or for evil that they become good or evil.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.