International order is not an evolution; it is an imposition. It is the domination of one vision over others- in this case, the domination of liberal free market principles of economics, democratic principles of politics, and a peaceful international system over other visions that other nations and peoples may have. It will last only as long as those who favor it retain the capacity to defend it.
Interpretation
The quote reflects on the imposition of a dominant international order shaped by liberal values over alternative visions from other nations.
Robert Kagan's quote articulates the idea that the current international order is not a natural progression but rather an imposed system that prioritizes liberal free market and democratic ideals. This dominance signifies a struggle between differing perspectives on governance and economics, suggesting that this order will endure only as long as its proponents are able to uphold it against challenges from competing viewpoints.
In practice
In a debate about global trade policies, this quote can emphasize the need to understand the impositions of certain economic principles.
Hezbollah-controlled Lebanon now presides over the UN Security Council. This means, in effect, that a terror organization presides over the body entrusted with guaranteeing the world's security. You couldn't make this thing up.
A wise nation should cultivate a political spirit that allows opponents to cooperate without fearing an automatic execution from their core supporters. Who knew that the real rogues in American politics would be the ones who dare to get along?
The 20th century shows that the form of government that we take for granted, a constitutional democratic republic with checks and balances and a rule of law - that form of government is usually temporary.
I don't see any possibility of Britain and the U.S. allowing a sovereign independent Iraq; that's almost inconceivable.
Are the peoples of the Middle East somehow beyond the reach of liberty? Are millions of men and women and children condemned by history or culture to live in despotism? Are they alone never to know freedom and never even to have a choice in the matter?
I can't think of a president who has been overburdened by a knowledge of economics.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.