Every society needs educated people, but the primary responsibility of educated people is to bring wisdom back into the community and make it available to others so that the lives they are leading make sense.
Like almost everyone else in America, I grew up believing the myth of the objective scientist. Fortunately I was raised on the edges of two very distinct cultures, western European and American Indian.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote challenges the notion of objectivity in science, highlighting cultural influences on knowledge.
Vine Deloria Jr. reflects on the prevalent belief in America regarding the 'objective scientist,' a myth that suggests scientists are unbiased and purely rational. He argues that his upbringing, influenced by both Western European and American Indian cultures, has given him a unique perspective that recognizes how cultural backgrounds shape our understanding of science and reality, thus questioning the idea of objectivity as an absolute truth.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a lecture about the influence of culture on scientific research, this quote can illustrate the importance of diverse perspectives.
More from Vine Deloria Jr.
All quotes →If the tribal peoples actually represented Western origins at a much earlier time, it was exceedingly valuable that they should be studied intensely for clues about the nature and origin of human society. Consequently it was an injury to science and human knowledge to allow the military to simply exterminate them.
The bottom line about the information possessed by non-Western peoples is that the information becomes valid only when offered by a white scholar recognized by the academic establishment; in effect, the color of the skin guarantees scientific objectivity.
Similar quotes
So many things I had thought forgotten Return to my mind with stranger pain: Like letters that arrive addressed to someone Who left the house so many years ago.
They say people can think for themselves? Do you honestly believe that the chap who can’t pass primary six knows the consequence of his choice when he answers a question viscerally, on language, culture and religion? But we knew the consequences. We would starve, we would have race riots. We would disintegrate.
Idiots are always in favour of inequality of income (their only chance of eminence), and the really great in favour of equality.
If you know that life is basically going to be horrendously difficult, at best, and all but unlivable at worst, or possibly even unlivable, do you go on? And the choice to go on is the only thing that I think can be called hope. Because if hope isn't forced to encounter the worst possibility, then it's a lie.
To reach me, you must move to me. Your attack offers me an opportunity to intercept you.
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. When the loyal opposition dies, I think the soul of America dies with it.