We must expect the discovery of many as yet unknown elements-for example, elements analogous to aluminum and silicon- whose atomic weight would be between 65 and 75.
The magnitude of the atomic weight determines the character of the element, just as the magnitude of the molecule determines the character of a compound body.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The properties of scientific substances are defined by their atomic and molecular weights.
This quote by Dmitri Mendeleev emphasizes that the characteristics of elements and compounds are fundamentally related to their atomic and molecular weights. Just as each element has a unique atomic weight that contributes to its identity and behavior, the combination of atoms into molecules defines the resulting compound's properties. This highlights the importance of atomic structure in chemistry and how it shapes our understanding of matter.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a science class, when discussing periodic table elements, one might say, 'As Mendeleev pointed out, the magnitude of atomic weight determines the character of the element.'
More from Dmitri Mendeleev
All quotes βNo law of nature, however general, has been established all at once; its recognition has always been preceded by many presentiments.
The most all penetrating spirit before which will open the possibility of tilting not tables, but planets, is the spirit of free human inquiry. Believe only in that.
It is the function of science to discover the existence of a general reign of order in nature and to find the causes governing this order. And this refers in equal measure to the relations of man - social and political - and to the entire universe as a whole.
The edifice of science not only requires material, but also a plan. Without the material, the plan alone is but a castle in the air-a mere possibility; whilst the material without a plan is but useless matter.
Similar quotes
[N]o scientist likes to be criticized. ... But you don't reply to critics: "Wait a minute, wait a minute; this is a really good idea. I'm very fond of it. It's done you no harm. Please don't attack it." That's not the way it goes. The hard but just rule is that if the ideas don't work, you must throw them away. Don't waste any neurons on what doesn't work. Devote those neurons to new ideas that better explain the data. Valid criticism is doing you a favor.
Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history.
The unreasonable efficiency of mathematics in science is a gift we neither understand nor deserve.
Chimps can do all sorts of things we thought that only we could do - like tool-making and abstraction and generalisation. They can learn a language - sign language - and they can use the signs. But when you think of our intellects, even the brightest chimp looks like a very small child.
We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universes, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.
Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority.