Man's chief moral deficiency appears to be not his indiscretions but his reticence.
Interpretation
The greatest moral failing of humans is often their unwillingness to speak up rather than their wrongdoings.
Hannah Arendt suggests that what truly hinders moral progress is not merely our mistakes or indiscretions, but rather our silence and unwillingness to engage in difficult conversations when faced with moral dilemmas. This reticence reflects a deep-seated fear or lack of courage to confront issues that require our voices to bring about change and understanding in society.
In practice
During a discussion on ethics in a classroom, this quote can emphasize the importance of speaking up.
A life spent entirely in public, in the presence of others, becomes, as we would say, shallow. While it retains its visibility, it loses its quality of rising into sight from some darker ground which must remain hidden if it is not to lose its depth in a very real, non-subjective sense.
Politically speaking, tribal nationalism [patriotism] always insists that its own people are surrounded by 'a world of enemies' - 'one against all' - and that a fundamental difference exists between this people and all others. It claims its people to be unique, individual, incompatible with all others, and denies theoretically the very possibility of a common mankind long before it is used to destroy the humanity of man.
We are wont to see friendship solely as a phenomenon of intimacy in which the friends open their hearts to each other unmolested by the world and its demands...Thus it is hard for us to understand the political relevance of friendship...But for the Greeks the essence of friendship consisted in discourse...The converse (in contrast to the intimate talk in which individuals speak about themselves), permeated though it may be by pleasure in the friendβs presence, is concerned with the common world.
Our tradition of political thought had its definite beginning in the teachings of Plato and Aristotle. I believe it came to a no less definite end in the theories of Karl Marx.
Even though we have lost yardsticks by which to measure, and rules under which to subsume the particular, a being whose essence is a beginning may have enough of origin within himself to understand without preconceived categories and to judge without the set of customary rules which is morality.
It is the nature of beginning that something new is started which cannot be expected from whatever may have happened before. This character of startling unexpectedness is inherent in all beginnings.
There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else.
We do not see people as they are, but as they appear to us. And these appearances are usually misleading.
Because the world is so full of death and horror, I try again and again to console my heart and pick the flowers that grow in the midst of hell.
Reason transformed into prejudice is the worst form of prejudice, because reason is the only instrument for liberation from prejudice.
The field of vision is comparable, for me, to the terrain of an archaeological dig. To see is to be on guard, to wait for what emerges from the background, without any name, without any particular interest: what was silent will speak, what is closed will open and will take on a voice.
Men have no special right because they belong to one race or another: the word man defines all rights.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.