Many investigators feel uneasy stating in public that the origin of life is a mystery, even though behind closed doors they admit they are baffled.
Interpretation
The origins of life remain an unresolved mystery that scientists often hesitate to discuss openly.
Paul Davies highlights the discomfort among scientists when discussing the enigmatic origins of life. Despite their scientific training and expertise, many researchers privately acknowledge their bafflement regarding how life began on Earth, yet they may refrain from publicly expressing this uncertainty due to societal expectations or potential backlash from the scientific community.
In practice
In a presentation on the challenges of astrobiology, one might use this quote to emphasize the complexities scientists face.
The temptation to believe that the Universe is the product of some sort of design, a manifestation of subtle aesthetic and mathematical judgment, is overwhelming. The belief that there is "something behind it all" is one that I personally share with, I suspect, a majority of physicists.
Science, we are repeatedly told, is the most reliable form of knowledge about the world because it is based on testable hypotheses. Religion, by contrast, is based on faith. The term 'doubting Thomas' well illustrates the difference.
Although the elusive 'cure' may be a distant dream, understanding the true nature of cancer will enable it to be better controlled and less menacing.
Traditionally, scientists have treated the laws of physics as simply 'given,' elegant mathematical relationships that were somehow imprinted on the universe at its birth, and fixed thereafter. Inquiry into the origin and nature of the laws was not regarded as a proper part of science.
For me, science is already fantastical enough. Unlocking the secrets of nature with fundamental physics or cosmology or astrobiology leads you into a wonderland compared with which beliefs in things like alien abductions pale into insignificance.
The laws of physics ... seem to be the product of exceedingly ingenious design... The universe must have a purpose.
In summoning even the wisest of physicians to our aid, it is probably that he is relying upon a scientific "truth", the error of which will become obvious in just a few years' time.
I have found far greater enthusiasm for science in America than here in Britain. There is more enthusiasm for everything in America.
We keep, in science, getting a more and more sophisticated view of our essential ignorance.
The paleoclimate record shouts to us that, far from being self-stabilizing, the Earth's climate system is an ornery beast which overreacts even to small nudges.
Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Law Giver.
[M]y work, which I've done for a long time, was not pursued in order to gain the praise I now enjoy, but chiefly from a craving after knowledge, which I notice resides in me more than in most other men. And therewithal, whenever I found out anything remarkable, I have thought it my duty to put down my discovery on paper, so that all ingenious people might be informed thereof.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.